since 2004 through a Google search As far as the Complainant contentions are concerned the Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark Furthermore the Respondent has no rights or legitimate

media platforms including Google Instagram Facebook and Twitter Thomas Cook Group UK Limited Thomas Cook is part of the Thomas Cook Group plc and is one of the world s leading leisure travel companies with sales over £ 8.5 billion in the

Pinterest Weibo You Tube Google Tumblr A.S.R Media & Sponsorship both as direct holder of trademark registrations and as de facto licensee of the A.S Roma S.p.A s trademark registrations which has in part delegated the AS Roma Group s

30 2015 On December 1 2015 Google Inc confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the njtranshit.com domain name is registered with Google Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google Inc has verified that Respondent is bound

Furthermore a brief search on Google's search engine reveals that most if not all references to Storvik Aqua refer to the Complainant The Panel is therefore satisfied that the Complainant has established unregistered rights in STORVIK AQUA for the

or Chinese A search on Google revealed only references to the Complainant on the first two pages It would be inconceivable that the Respondent had no knowledge and actual notice of the Complainant s mark when the Domain Name was registered

in comparison to the use of Google Recent November 2015 web analytics confirm that Google maintains over 70 percent of market share while Bing is only used by 12 percent of consumers 6 Discussion and Findings The Panel notes at the outset that

sur le moteur de recherche Google fournit différents résultats tous en relation avec le Requérant Or il appartenait au Défendeur de vérifier que l'enregistrement du Nom de Domaine Litigieux ne portait pas atteinte aux droits de marque que

could no longer be found on Google searches 5 the Respondent had not sought to sell the disputed domain name The offer of USD 50000 had been a number plucked from the air made without knowing who the offer was being made to 6 the disputed domain

Google Inc v Vasim Machhar / AdsenseClickers Claim Number FA1512001651380 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is Vasim Machhar / AdsenseClickers

opportunistic bad faith Google Inc v Jennifer Burns FA726096 Nat Arb Forum Aug 16 2006 Respondent s continued retention and non-use of each of the Disputed Domain Names for approximately 12 months as of the date of the Complaint and

by a search for topcare on Google which shows a large number of companies named topcare or top care the disputed domain name has been hosted on the Sedo servers NS1.SEDOPARKING.COM and NS2.SEDOPARKING.COM since March 2013 and has been up for 32

the Domain Name Moreover a Google search on the expression AEG provides several results all of which are linked with the Complainant The Domain Name string contains the identical string for AEG mark in its entirety The addition of what the Panel

since September 6 2013 and a Google Analytics Audience Overview from October 1 2013 and October 28 2015 As highlighted above the Complainant contends that although the disputed domain name was registered on February 23 2009 it was purchased by the

listed as Deloitte Daniel a Google search for Deloitte Daniel and Daniel Deloitte in the Seychelles returned no relevant results The Complainant also provided evidence that as at October 23 2015 the disputed domain name did not revert to an

The Respondent has also filed Google Adwords Over view reflecting the name of the bank and disputed domain names The Respondent states that the bank has filed a trademark application of its device mark ITC BANK bearing number 2191712 dated August

Policy Paragraph4 a i See e.g Google v Privacy-Protect.cn FA1301001480881 Nat Arb Forum Feb 25 2013 holding that Respondent s googlefiles1.com domain is confusingly similar to the Complainant s trademark GOOGLE and characterizing the number 1 as a

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

not argued that according to google translate the terms creer son and site appear to be French for create its and site Panels have held that the addition of the gTLDs org and com is not relevant for a Policy Paragraph 4 a i analysis See

2730000 search results on the Google search engine for the phrase gun broker From July 24 2015 to August 24 2015 alone Gunbroker.com has registered over 5.2 million unique visitors and over 132 million page views The GunBroker Site features more