FINDINGS Complainant is Google Inc of Mountain View CA USA Complainant was established in 1997 and has offered a broad array of technological products and services since that time under its GOOGLE mark Google is also the owner of numerous

is a page that contains only google ads and a link where the Respondent offers the public to buy the disputed domain name for USD 6000 Finally the Complainant submits that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith

Complainant is at the top of Google for searches against delta sonic Accordingly the Respondent should have been aware that the Complainant has substantial trade mark rights in its mark The Complainant attempted to purchase the disputed domain

NAF Claim No 791657 Google Inc v Jennifer Burns NAF Claim No 726096 The Cheesecake Factory Inc and The Cheesecake Factory Assets Co LLC v Say Cheesecake WIPO Case No D2005-0766 Napster Inc v Giovanni Vinscani WIPO Case No D2005-0531

of SEO on these sites and Google is currently ranking them Obviously as the name is pertinent to your company I would like to offer this out to you for £350 in order to cover my costs Otherwise my business model for such domains is to open up

Google Inc v jerome gauthier / Goog-ad development LTD Claim Number FA1510001644533 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Melissa Alcantara of Dickinson Wright PLLC California USA Respondent is jerome gauthier /

to which it is attached See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

dollar bank loan center on Google search engine refer to the Complainant Furthermore the Complainant appears to operate the websites www.dollarbank.com and www.dollarbankloancenter.com the domain name dollarbankloancenter.com is registered to

of other domain names such as googlejump.com and googlemobility.net The Respondent is also the registrant of lanxess.wang ciscosystems.xyz and remycointreau.wang Not much else is known about the Respondent A Google Maps search of the Respondent

homepage provided by Google translate which indicates that the Respondent presents himself as Herbalife flagship store or the official website of Herbalife B Respondent The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant contentions 6

name of the city of Paris See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

Internet users computers See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Nat Arb Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv

similar domain name see also Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Nat Arb Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv

received several reviews on Google Play b That on August 3 2015 the Complainant sent a letter to the Respondent indicating that the disputed domain name infringed the trademark rights of the Complainant and requested it to transfer the disputed

to be fictitious Given that a Google search for Space Avenue Houston does not return any real location of that name the Panel accepts the Complainant s submission that the Respondent has provided false contact details The Panel is satisfied that

eurizon on the search engines Google and Yahoo google.com.au and au.yahoo.com reveal the Complainant the Complainant s subsidiary and its website as the top search results with ensuing hits also largely related to various pages concerning the

een simpele zoekopdracht via Google achter het bestaan van Eiser kunnen komen Voor het registreren van een nl-domeinnaam is een dergelijke zoekopdracht niet vereist maar dat neemt niet weg dat domeinnamen voor eigen risico worden geregistreerd

engine results such as the Google search engine was apparent and therefore the Panel infers that the Respondent was well aware of the Complainant s mark and business at the date of registration but nevertheless sought to accept transfer of the

Apple iTunes App Store and Google Play Store The POPMONEY trade mark is featured on the websites of its clients on which the Complainant s services are available The Complainant owns several trade mark registrations for POPMONEY in the United

for the Complainant using Google may visit the landing page linked to its Google Place profile assuming it is the official website of the Complainant and may be discouraged from purchasing goods from the Complainant B Respondent The Respondent