services is provided through Google s DomainPark program hosted by DoubleClick This services presumably benefits the registrant through reduced hosting fees Under the Bluehost.com user agreement a user can opt out of the Parked Page Services at

Case No D2004-0784 citing Google Inc v wwwgoogle.com and Jimmy Siavesh Behain WIPO Case No D2000-1240 Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Casio Computer Co Ltd v Jongchan Kim WIPO Case No D2003-0400 Downstream Technologies LLC v Bartels System GmbH WIPO

Inc WIPO Case No D2015-0836 Google Inc v Dzone Inc Yeonju Hong/ Whois Privacy Services Pty Ltd WIPO Case No D2011-1033 Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Mike Kerry Dzone Inc WIPOCase No D2014-2219 Lange Uhren GmbH v Whois Privacy Services Pty Ltd /

Google Inc v BIZEXTEND S.R.L / Artur Caus Claim Number FA1508001632867 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Melissa Alcantara of Dickinson Wright PLLC U.S.A Respondent is BIZEXTEND S.R.L / Artur Caus Respondent

redes sociales como Facebook Google Plus Instagram Pinterest Twitter y YouTube Entre otras la Promovente es la titular de las siguientes marcas registradas Registro Marca Clases País o jurisdicción de la marca Fecha de Registro 941384 WHOLE

to add to the confusion See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

to Policy Paragraph4 b iv See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Nat Arb Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph4 b iv

designed in tandem with Google Facebook and other leading players in the Internet world have been offered as online university courses for the last three years The Complainant has trademark registrations for UDACITY registered and used in the

Google Inc v Whois Privacy Corp / Domain Admin Claim Number FA1508001632285 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Morgan Champion of Cooley LLP Washington D.C USA Respondent is Whois Privacy Corp / Domain Admin

the context of the Policy See Google Inc v Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 it has been accepted in several previous UDRP panel decisions that typosquatting itself is evidence of bad faith registration and use In Google

performance A search on the Google search engine reveals literally thousands of addicting games websites Thus Respondent claims that the words addicting games fail to function as a trademark By way of example Respondent provides a list of just

Respondent Secondly a simple Google search for Emigrant Bank provides substantial references to the Complainant s long standing business However there is some ambiguity about when the Complainant first started using the EMIGRANT BANK mark The

the Respondent including that Google search results for Stages provide 1250000 000 results of which at least the first two pages show no reference to Complainant and the Panel s finding that the Respondent s denial of knowledge of the Complainant

s MEDIACOM mark See Google Inc v Java Den Web Solutions FA1010001355351 NAF March 20 2011 finding that the word cloud has specific meanings in the context of computing and the Internet and given that Complainant is engaged specifically in

uma simples busca no serviço Google VII O Reclamado não foi licenciado autorizado ou recebeu qualquer tipo de permissão para utilizar a marca MONEYCORP VIII Deve-se aplicar ao caso em tela decisão do Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro que

website which features Google Adwords advertisements some of which redirect to suppliers of products competing with those of the Complainant The Respondent is an individual and appears to be a resident of the United States 5 Parties

Paragraph 4 b iv see also Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Nat Arb Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv

CONTENTIONS A Complainant A GOOGLE AND ITS GOOGLE AND GOOGLE PLAY MARKS AND GOOGLE PLAY LOGO 2 Google is a Delaware corporation located in Mountain View California with offices throughout the world 3 The GOOGLE name and company were created in

trademark NOVELL see also Google Inc v N/A/ k gautam FA 1524232 Nat Arb Forum Nov 18 2013 finding that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the at-issue mark despite the misspelling of the mark by omitting letters the addition of

and exhibits the results of a Google search The Complainant contends that on account of extensive usage of the trade mark TATA the said mark is identified solely and exclusively only with the Complainant and its group company Tata Motors and none