50 countries according to the Google Analytics data included in the Complaint As noted above the disputed domain name was registered on October 27 2014 The disputed domain name resolves to a website which is a parked for free website It includes a

is not a legitimate use See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Nat Arb Forum Sep 23 2010 Respondent s failure to make an active use of the disputed domain names except for the purpose of downloading malicious computer software is not a use in

on Citrix products AT ALL Google/Motorola is my last implementation From now on I will be working with the VMware folks selling and consulting on their products Just closed a 2MM VDI deal that will keep me tied up for over a year Let me know if

DE BRETAGNE® Finally a Google search on the expression CMB or CM BRETAGNE provides several results all of them being in relation with the Complainant Accordingly the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant s

provides the Panel with a Google search showing the name only identified by its connection to the disputed domain name See Compl at Attached Ex 6 As there is insufficient evidence in the record affirming Respondent is in fact commonly known by

of this were required a Google search for either the terms vietnam war vw or war vw does not produce as far as the Panel can see even a single example of such usage In fact all of the examples produced by the Respondents seem to the Panel to

not provided and print out of Google searches performed against the term FQ cars performed in October 2014 The Google search results almost exclusively relate in one way or another to Mitsubishi vehicles 5.2 The Complainant maintains that the

I attach photographs from Google Maps showing that Sussex Motorcycles does not have any visible presence they are a tin shed hidden on a farm with no signage to indicate any form of motorcycle business Their own website even denies that they

printout of the results of a Google search performed against the words Croisieres de France This shows organic search results where the first result returned appears to involve a link to the Complainant s website 5.5 The Complainant maintains that

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp Claim Number FA1501001600801 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is Domain Admin

its Website and having done Google searches to determine that the disputed domain name was available Accordingly the disputed domain name is not confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights Before receiving the

fastest rising words used for Google searching in the UAE The Complainant has expended very considerable amounts of time energy and money to advertise promote and market its associated website Its Facebook page has over 2.5 million likes and

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v GOOGLE REKLAM EK B / GOOGLE REKLAM Claim Number FA1501001602374 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Denis V Shamo of Dickinson Wright PLLC District of Columbia USA Respondent is

names The Complainant s Google search results annexed to the Complaint in support of its allegation regarding prominent references to the Complaint for PBZ are personalised because the Complainant was logged into Google when the search was

fields Examples in the Google search annexed to the Response include Central Illinois Bank Citizens Independent Bank and Commercial International Bank Many of the hits returned are also to the Complainant s Hungarian arm Finally he says that

publicita en los Adwords de Google con la marca BAÑERA SEGURA especulando con captar el público de Bañera Segura de las Demandantes El Demandado ni siquiera publicita con su propia marca y nombre Fácil Acceso ya que al ingresar dichos

s registered mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

is not a legitimate use See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Nat Arb Forum Sep 23 2010 Respondent s failure to make an active use of the disputed domain names except for the purpose of downloading malicious computer software is not a use in

contains evidence of a Google search for the terms dbat and database which returned some 141000 results that have nothing to do with Complainant and reiterates that the character string dbat is and has been used as an acronym in connection

fact the meta data shows that Google Analytics is being run on the site There are no terms of service even to explain what laws govern the site or to whom users are providing possibly sensitive health data over the open Internet Under such