of Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Sunil K iSupport Solution / Aditi Sawant iSupport Solution / Rohit Sharma / Vineet Sharma / Deep / Sunil K Claim Number FA1501001599162 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Chantal

manner since 2001 A Google search does not bring up any reference to a website at the disputed domain name and a company search in the Massachusetts company registry reveals that The Reale Group does not exist as a corporation Therefore

s investigation led to a Google street view of Respondent s address as provided by the WHOIS record which shows a London taxi cab outside Respondent s entrance with a LYCA advertisement on the vehicle See Compl at Attached Ex 18 Based on the

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Gridasov FA 474816 Nat Arb Forum July 5 2005 finding that the respondent s use of a disputed domain name that attempts to download malicious computer software into the computers of those who visit the

Policy Paragraph4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Sep 14 2004 Complainant uses GOOGLE to identify its online search engine and related services and products The google-advertising.us and google-placementads.us domain names are confusingly similar to the GOOGLE mark The disputed domain names

argues most of the Google s search results about Dirty Spokes are third party references to the Complainant 3 Complainant argued that Respondent either did nothing to research the mark or did so knowing that the Complainant was using the

by Complainant through a Google search of the term In fact the Panel notes that he majority of the google search results and nearly all the results in the first two searches referred to Complainant s AUTOZONE mark The Panel also finds that It

Moreover a search via Google or any other Internet search engine using the keyword Areva or Arevamines shows that all of the first results relate to Complainant products or services Moreover Respondents never denied having knowledge of

1 Complainant uses GOOGLE to promote its vast online information news and media business The GOOGLE mark is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO e.g Reg No 2806075 registered Jan 20 2004 The

inside engines such as Google Yahoo or Bing for the words serviclub and catalogo are related with the Complainant That the content of the web page to which the disputed domain name resolves resembled and imitated an official YPF website a

sites on Facebook Twitter and Google plus Complainant s parent company NBTY Inc is the owner of the vitaminworld.com domain name as well as the vitaminworld.net and numerous domain names with org info biz us co and ca top-level domains several of

applications on such sites as Google Facebook Twitter YouTube etc The Complainant also asserted that they provide a variety of related MySQL services including training and developer certification for developers programmers and website designers

Suchmaske der Suchmaschine Google eingetragen werden über 6 Mio Treffer angezeigt und die ersten 100 Suchergebnisse beziehen sich ausschließlich auf die Castingshow der Beschwerdeführerin Auch in der Presseberichterstattung wird das Akronym

on such well-known sites as Google Facebook Twitter YouTube etc and often functions without the website user being aware of its existence As part of its MySQL offering Complainant also provides a variety of related services including training

20 2004 Complainant uses the GOOGLE mark in connection with its business as one of the top search engines in the world Complainant operates primarily through the google.com domain name Respondent registered google-advertising-start.com domain name

that are auto-generated by Google based upon the words vanity or shop Respondent disputes Complainant s contention that the disputed domain name is similar to a mark in which Complainant has rights Respondent notes that Complainant s trademark

name a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword auchan would have shown up results which relate to the Complainant and its products Further the Respondent neither tried to defend his rights or justify the

site are auto-generated by Google and are constantly changing based on Google keyword advertising inventory and user search behavior It is undisputed that the hyperlinks provide pay-per-click revenue for Respondent The website also bears a