BANNK OF THE SIERRA mark See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

and adopted the name and mark GOOGLE in 1997 The Complainant s Google search engine is used each month by more than 581 million users worldwide including millions of users in the USA and Romania In addition to that the Complainant has various

Paragraph 4 a i analysis See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

search or even regular Google search at the time of the registration of the domain names would have revealed the Complainant registrations of the AUCHAN trademark The Complainant also contends that auchanbank.com is also used in bad faith as

to actiqcoupons.com put the Google AdSense account number into the programming code to host syndicated ads for pay-per-click revenue including competitive ads all of which is not in good faith The domain names were registered in order to prevent

surevymonkey.com E.g Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 mere addition of a single letter Belkin Components v Gallant FA 97075 Nat Arb Forum May 29 2001 slight misspelling Wyndham IP Corp v LaPorte Holdings Inc FA

shown by a cursory search on Google Maps which did not match any street under the name of south service road in the city of Santiago Chile let alone a 0000000 zip code The provision of false contact information on WhoIs is additional evidence of

checked by a simple search in Google search engine Moreover Respondent has not denied in his Response the relationship between the disputed domain name and the restaurant in Teheran showing the Complainant trademarks FIVE GUYS and FIVE GUYS BURGERS

mark in the UAE market a UAE Google search for Dugas reveals about 602000 results The Complainant contends that an Internet user is likely to assume that the Complainant is the sponsor of or associated with the website identified by the Disputed

filing date April 27 2010 See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Thompson v

others websites through the Google AdChoices service that offer competing services using advertising hyperlinks labeled inter alia Pearson Online Textbook Pearson Success Net Pearson on the PEARSONSUCCESSNET.US website and hyperlinks labeled

services A search on Google reveals that Complainant has a website at www.docantle.net as well as a Facebook page and Twitter feed both listed under Doc Antle Complainant has held the domain name docantle.net since 2009 However he has been

WIPO Case No D2004-0962 Google Inc v Nijat Hassanov WIPO Case No D2011-1054 In view of the above the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has met the requirements under paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate Interests The

of confusing similarity See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

the first ten pages of the Google search engine in Hungary for the term frizsider and notes that it found nothing with regard to the Complainant or its mark With regard to the Complainant assertion that its mention of USD 50000 was a

WIPO Case No D2004-0962 Google Inc v Nijat Hassanov WIPO Case No D2011-1054 In view of the above the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has met the requirements under paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate Interests The

trademark when doing a Google search of NATWEST all top results relate to the Complainant The NATWEST brand was recently ranked number 39 in the list of the UK s most valuable brands The Complainant says that the Respondent has used the

BDO en el motor de búsqueda Google donde los primeros resultados se refieren a www.bdomexico.com y la mayoría del resto de los resultados se refieren a otras Firmas Miembro BDO Desde su registro en el 2006 y hasta muy recientemente el nombre de

search for the term BELVIQ in Google returns 1140000 hits in 0.12 seconds with all of the hits from at least the first ten pages referring to Complainant s BELVIQ trademark Through Complainant s and Eisai s significant expenditure of time money and

domain name See e.g Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark