the Panel finds that the googleglassapps1.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE GLASS mark See Google Inc v serap ozk FA 1562193 Nat Arb Forum July 14 2014 finding that adding terms removing the space in the GOOGLE

Disputed Domain Name A simple Google search on the term anadarko returns many results regarding the Complainant The Respondent registered the Disputed Domain Name which is identical to the Complainant s ANADARKO trade mark and used it to direct

em disputa no site de busca Google Nota-se que o Reclamado aparece ligado a outros nomes de domínio entre eles o site H2O2 Gemas Brasil www.gemasbrasil.com de comércio eletrônico O nome empresarial utilizado bem como o nome fantasia conforme

does not come up in any Google searches was never referred to by the Respondent in its Response or in prior correspondence with the Complainant or its legal representatives and is inconsistent with the tenor of the correspondence between the

7 2014 it reverted to a Google search with information on the LEGIÃO URBANA band its albums and history Regardless the Panel finds that the disputed domain name may indeed create false associations between Complainant and Respondent

to other websites under the Google AdSense program These include advertisements relating to shoes from competing manufacturers This is not a bona fide offering of goods according to the Complainant The Respondent has registered and is using the

names a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword Auchan would have revealed to the Respondent the existence of the Complainant and its trademark Moreover according to the Complainant the fact that the Respondent

bath in Complainant s mark In Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 the panel concluded that the mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark did not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of

lists yields 33411 results A Google search excluding reference to the Complainant reveals approximately 12500000 third party results mainly showing up for the surname Ritchey Ritchey is a common family name subject to extensive third party use

have conducted a search on Google because Google did not exist and he could not have searched the Indian Trademark Database at that time Indeed there is virtually no way the Respondent could have known of the Complainant existence in 1997 The

s TD AUTO FINANCE mark See Google Inc v N/A/ k gautam FA 1524232 Nat Arb Forum Nov 18 2013 finding that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the at-issue mark despite the misspelling of the mark by omitting letters the addition of

4 a i analysis see also Google Inc v N/A/ k gautam FA 1524232 Nat Arb Forum Nov 18 2013 finding that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the at-issue mark despite the misspelling of the mark by omitting letters the addition of

trademark registrations See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 the complainant established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Respondent s amazonfirephone.us

names Copy of Results of Google search for a term PROMOVACANCES The Complainant also presents other facts and evidence to show that the domain name has been registered and used in bad faith and that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate

any other purpose Historical Google searches for the Respondent have shown that the Respondent was not commonly known as newsmax4 at the time of registration of the disputed domain name whereas the Complainant is well known amongst its large

better organic listing in Google and to increase traffic FINDINGS Complainant DoorKing Inc provides access control systems in residential commercial and industrial applications has offered these goods and services since 1948 and has been using

shown by the fact that in a Google search for money tree software the first hit and many of the following hits are to Complainant s website www.moneytree.com Further there have been instances of actual confusion summarized in the record in which

do not have But on the Google search result screen shot for Thredbo reservations the material associated with that domain name appears to offer only accommodation principally at Woodridge a discrete area in Thredbo Village which a consumer

the domain and instead is a Google site page that can be created by any individual with a Google account The Complainant also states that at the time of the filing of the Complaint there was nothing on any of websites at the disputed domain names

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Private Protection Co.LTD Claim Number FA1407001568361 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Denis V Shamo of Dickinson Wright PLLC Washington D.C USA Respondent is Private