the United Kingdom version of Google produces approximately 661000 results the very first of which is for the Loehmann s web site located at www.loehmanns.com In addition there are numerous articles about the chain as well as links to the Loehmann

se realiza una búsqueda en Google con ese término ni siquiera aparece algo relacionado con el Dr Sears y su marca registrada Por tanto es absurdo intentar demostrar una mala fe por el Demandado que intenta confundir en la búsqueda cuando una

throughout the state A Google search of the terms commerica or comerica produces an extensive listing of search results devoted almost exclusively to Complainant and its COMERICA brand and mark In view of the particular circumstances in this

s registration see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant

4 a iv See for example Google Inc v Fundacion Private Whois / Domain Administrator FA 1495039 Nat Arb Forum May 30 2013 a panel there finding that r espondent s use of the disputed domain name to host malware or to feature competing

adult-oriented material See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

all the major search engines Google Yahoo and Bing using KELOGG as the search term For the above stated reasons and because Complainant owns long-standing and valuable rights that are infringed by Respondent s identical and/or confusingly similar

claimed to be well known See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

or the search result on Google do not give the impression that there is a commercial link between the Respondent s business and the business of the Complainant or that it belongs to the Complainant s distribution network or that there is a

WIPO Case No D2004-0962 Google Inc v Nijat Hassanov WIPO Case No D2011-1054 In view of the above the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has met the requirements under paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate Interests The

ha comprado un AdWord de Google para desviar público de los servicios ofrecidos por la marca UOC a su página Web Por lo tanto no puede haber un interés legítimo en los nombres de dominio en disputa sino un aprovechamiento desleal del gran

and other websites Even a Google search which limits results to dates between 2003 and 2005 and excludes Complainant s own websites shows how extensive was the reputation of the WORDPRESS Mark during Complainant s early history In 2006

been commonly known by the google-android-security.com domain name and is not now known by the google-android-security.com domain name The WHOIS information identifies this domain name s registrant as Wei Zhang Respondent uses the

using the NEWPORT mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

makes extensive use of the Google AdSense program All ads lead to commercially active sites of third parties within the field of operations of Complainant The vast majority of these ads are for competing businesses but even for Complainant

has provided evidence that a Google search for Madame Tussaud returns as the first ten hits websites which relate to the Complainant Evidence shows that as at January 22 2014 shortly prior to the Complaint the disputed domain name was redirecting

WIPO Case No D2004-0962 Google Inc v Nijat Hassanov WIPO Case No D2011-1054 In view of the above the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has met the requirements under paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate Interests The

a screenshot from the Google search engine showing a search for the term qualify.com which in addition to search results returns the question Did you mean qwalify.com It is alleged and not disputed that the Respondent Gregory Ricks is a

por medio del buscador Google en español que el representante de la Demandante D Manuel Garrido Osuna resulta tener historial y hábito de practicar la ciberpiratería inversa de nombres de dominio ya sea por medio de la empresa que realiza

to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark