scheme is use in bad faith Google Inc v Robert Takovich WIPO Case No DMX2012-0006 BinckBank N.V v.Silue Tiessolikaabdoul WIPO Case No D2011-1980 Confederation Nationale du credit Mutuel v Daniel Delcore WIPO Case No DLC2009-0001 Australia and

in search engines such as Google would have revealed to the Respondent the existence of the Complainant and its trademarks In this context the Complainant refers to decisions where the panel found that there is bad faith registration where a

с се� виса Google Adsense составил 9936 долла� ов США �'ебсайт имел частые упоминания и публикации в социальных сетях в частности в Facebook

of one of its directors of Google search results for quarry valuations and quarry value The Complainant claims that its own website and trademark occupies the top three search results for quarry valuations and the top two search results for

s domain names See e.g Google Inc v Noorinet FA 138879 Nat Arb Forum July 6 2011 Google Inc v Noorinet FA 1502299 Nat Arb Forum Sept 24 2013 Past panels have found that a respondent with a documented history of involvement in UDRP decisions

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v N/A / k gautam Claim Number FA1310001524232 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Katie Krajeck of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is N/A / k gautam Respondent India REGISTRAR

of the Policy See for example Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

around the world See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also Orange

the results of a search on Google for the term file xpress yields 9.55 million separate web pages The Respondent notes that the Complainant uses the term File Express with the additional letter e in its online advertising on Google This the

he earned a few dollars from Google Adsense click-throughs from the website The Respondent surrenders the Domain Name to the Complainant and consents to the remedy requested by the Complainant namely that the Domain Name be transferred to the

agencies around the world See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Therefore the

Act complaint was sent to Google Inc Despite the notice the website remains active 4 The Complainant has performed a search based on the contact number listed on the WhoIs details and found that the Respondent has registered numerous domain

Center EXPERTENENTSCHEID Google Inc v Dr István Dózsa Verfahren Nr DCH2013-0015 1 Die Parteien Die Gesuchstellerin ist Google Inc aus Mountain View Kalifornien Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika vertreten durch Baker & McKenzie Schweiz Der

the Panel with a few simple Google searches Furthermore the website to which the disputed domain name resolves indicates that the Respondent intentionally selected the disputed domain name for its gaming suggestiveness While not usually pertinent

he should have to conduct Google searches of the domain names that he registers The website at the Disputed Domain Name is being used as a holding page which is not generating any profit The Respondent is able to sell the Disputed Domain Name

occurred if it did Google Adsense reports are annexed and do show higher activity in the periods December to January and March than in February 2013 which may support an inference that advertising did occur in those months as claimed The

had conducted a simple Google search or visited the corresponding com domain name lockheedmartin.com it would have identified the Complainant as a trade mark holder The terms lockheed and martin are coined words that combined have no meaning

5 2013 I would include google advertising in these websites in an attempt to earn advertising revenue from Google when a reader of my blog website clicked on google ads that appeared on the site These facts lead to the common sense

to an active web site See the Google toolbar Oops This link appears to be broken notice According to the Network Solutions Registrar WHOIS database http //www.networksolutions.com/ the Respondent is currently soliciting offers directly on the

rectangular boxes displaying Google Results Google Monthly Searches and Google Japan Monthly Results for the terms Tadashi Yanai Tadashi and Yanai followed by these bullet points Great Domain Name Easy to type Easy to remember Short name Brandable