Complainant has engaged Google advertising services established Twitter and Facebook promotional campaigns and has developed and aired web-based promotional videos vi Complainant has become an industry leader in offering domain name

meaning Nor does a cursory Google search offer any support for such a claim To the contrary it appears that unrelated descriptive uses of PLR store predominate to such an extent that the Panel found no references whatsoever associated with

complainant s marks see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v Serghiy Vasilchenko / Serg Vasilchenko / ahnames Claim Number FA1308001516098 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Katie Krajeck of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Serghiy

website comes up first in a Google search for ZCreative See Complainant s Annex Therefore the Panel finds that due to the fame of Complainant mark Respondent had actual knowledge of Complainant s marks and Complainant rights therein Thus the

of the Policy The panel in Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 held that the complainant had established rights in its claimed mark through its holding of several trademark registrations throughout the world The Panel here

Lookup Report Preview and Google search results which have been annexed with the Additional Submissions of Complainant as Exhibit B The Domain at issue in this case aircompressorhusky.com was among the domain names owned by Mr Alavi at the time

developed Respondent used the Google AdSense program and ads were selected and placed automatically on the disputed domain name by Google algorithms f In 2010 Respondent enrolled the disputed domain name in the Amazon Affiliate aStore program which

pursuant to the Policy See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

Paragraph 4 c iii See Google Inc v NURINET / Noorinet / NURINET FA 1502299 Nat Arb Forum Sept 24 2013 finding no bona fide purpose behind the hosting of assorted unrelated hyperlink advertisements through a confusingly similar domain name

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

contact information Google Inc Complainant uses the BING mark in connection with the offering of online searches and information services related to travel shopping and other commercial interest Complainant offers its services in various

itself off as Complainant See Google Inc v power sky a/k/a wanglun Natl Arb Forum Case No FA1109001407268 October 27 2011 Indeed in two previous UDRP proceedings involving some of the same trademarks at issue here the Panels found that the

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Nat Arb Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent s use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content

in a domain name see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Paragraph 4 a i See e.g Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Respondent s

significant notoriety in the GOOGLE and ADWORDS marks worldwide b Respondent s infringing activities i Policy Paragraph 4 a i 1 The adwordgoogle.net domain name is confusingly similar to the GOOGLE mark as the domain name fully incorporates the

site was built using Java and Google Web Toolkit on the front-end and MySQL database on the back-end It employs more advanced web technologies such as AJAX and DHTML and is cross-browser compatible In preparation for launch I am also re-directing

apadandroid.com g1android.com google24.com googleadd.com google-ads.com googleaudio.com googleblue.com googleface.com googlefarm.com googlefilter.com googleforbusiness.com googleiran.com googlemagic.com googlemanager.com googleoptimierung.com

20 2004 Complainant owns the google.com domain name in addition to hundreds of other GOOGLE-formative domain names at nearly every top-level country-code Respondent resides in the Canary Islands Spain and registered the domain name