resolving website See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

was created Moreover all the Google results for the term METACAM refers to the Complainant s drug Given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademarks and reputation it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

la OMPI DECISI� N DEL EXPERTO Google LLC c Javier Cruz Fernandez Caso no DES2021-0042 1 Las Partes La Demandante es Google LLC Estados Unidos de América Estados Unidos representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados España El Demandado es Javier Cruz

as follows � Complainant Google LLC operates one of the most highly recognized search engine services � Complainant has rights in the GOOGLE mark based on registration of the mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO �

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world �

under Policy � 4 a iii � See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world �

for the term immo-afer via Google top results triggered relate to the trade mark AFER IMMO and the Complainant Then there is the addition of the generic Top-Level-Domain gTLD com As is generally accepted the addition of a gTLD such as com is

simple online search e.g via Google or Baidu for the term arkea would have revealed that it is a brand enjoying a definite degree of fame worldwide The Respondent has provided no explanation or evidence to justify its registration of the disputed

ni aparecen en el buscador de Google con la marca FOTOMATON BARCELONA luego no pueden hacer la competencia ni aprovecharse de la reputación de la Demandante o ser utilizados de mala fe y además fueron adquiridos en 2017 sin que hasta ahora haya

l aide du moteur de recherche Google configuré de telle manière que la requête soit localisée en France pays dans lequel le Défendeur a indiqué son domicile La quasi-totalité des résultats se rapporte au Requérant tandis qu aucun ne

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world Complainant

under Policy � 4 a iii � See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

for Novartispharmacie in the Google search engine the returned results pointed to the Complainant and its business activities The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the Disputed Domain Name and would have

On the contrary a Google search of travismathew reveals that the results of such search are referred to the Complainant There is no evidence that the Respondent has been making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name

provided evidence that the Google search of the terms verisure or verisuresmartalarms leads to the Complainant and its business Additionally the Complainant provided evidence that the Respondent does not have any trademarks corresponding to the

top level AA 1 at issue google status.com aftershokzus com praftershokzus ALIBABA COM names � postmaster@aftershokzus postmaster@praftershokzus 1 ��� 2 4 Respondent 3 0 google-status name L C calcuttawebdevelopers Page Click ICANN s

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world Complainant

account tiktoksaudia and a Google Play Store apps TikTok Store which incorporate Complainant's TIK TOK trademark Complainant contends that these incidents indicate Respondent's general intent to profit from the reputation and goodwill of