of an extract taken from the Google translator-website Annex 5 that the term RUOU means wine in Vietnamese language The Complainant particularly relies on two UDRP-decisions ADR Case n° 100548 E REMY MARTIN & C vs Fred Frampton buyremymartin.com

� �量之� 以及� �过 Google �'� Baidu.com 搜索 chan luu � �示的原告� �接之广均可证� �），被投诉人注册争议域名� �� �� �出于从投诉人及其 CHAN LUU 标识中非法牟利� �

different subject matter A Google search for Respondent versus Complainant results in search findings that do not overlap The identical word mark HEALTH NOW was registered on December 21 1992 by non-party Health Now Products Inc of Woodside

phrase plainly refers to the Google Public DNS service offered by Complainant under the GOOGLE Mark According to the WHOIS database Respondent claims to be Google Inc / DNS Admin However Respondent is not affiliated with Google and Google does not

parties as evidenced by a Google search for ambit which returns about 9750000 results of companies organizations and non-commercial using the term These entities represent representing uses as diverse as mathematic studies architecture and

Name Page 2 the site via eg Google would be sent automatically to your State new procurement portal residing at Buyspeed.com This was done because we know that it often takes the search engines quite a bit of time to update their listings and we

of Policy Paragraph4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complaint

Paragraph 4 a i analysis See Google Inc v Haydar Bas FA 1009001349314 Nat Arb Forum Nov 18 2010 finding google43.com confusingly similar to GOOGLE mark The Panel finds that Complainant has satisfied Policy Paragraph 4 a i Rights or Legitimate

arbitration forum DECISION Google Inc v ResolutionSet / Derek Stevens Claim Number FA1302001486193 PARTIES Complainant is Google Inc Complainant represented by Nicole M Meyer of Dickinson Wright PLLC District of Columbia USA Respondent is

name and the DAILIES mark See Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

has common law rights in the GOOGLE PLAY mark under Policy Paragraph 4 a i Complainant believes that this googleplay-russia.com domain name is confusingly similar to the GOOGLE PLAY mark Complainant notes that the domain name includes the entire

iv Respondent registered the googlemapsl.com and mapslgoogle.com domain names August 29 2005 Confusing similarity Respondent s google-map.com google-maps.com googlemaps.net googlemapsl.com googlemeps.com map-google.com maps-google.com

take the visitor to Apps on Google Play Respondent s promotion of Complainant s competitors on the xbox-gold.com website constitutes a bad faith disruption of Complainant s business under Policy Paragraph 4 b iii See Univ of Texas Sys v Smith FA

Forum Oct 23 2012 see also Google Inc v PPA Media Servs / Ryan G Foo FA 1468207 Nat Arb Forum Dec 12 2012 Previous panels have found that multiple adverse UDRP rulings against a respondent are evidence of a pattern of bad faith supporting a bad

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Further the

sharing and file storage ii A Google search reveals multiple computer file software utilities called File Sense b A legitimate interest may be found in a domain name that represents a descriptive and non-distinctive combination of two words and is

Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

s country of operation See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Williams-Sonoma

FINISH LINE mark See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Nat Arb Forum September 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent s bad faith under Policy Paragraph 4 b iv