Respondent s restaurants in Google Reviews Consequently the Complainant initiated the present UDRP proceeding against the Respondent concerning the Domain Name and also a separate proceeding concerning the domain name al-baik.com The latter

700 reviews and 4.6 rating On Google Play the Complainant s Application has over 544 000 reviews and a 4.4 rating overall The Complainant holds worldwide trademark registrations for SCRIBD such as the following the International Registration No

s advertising through Google AdWords between November 2016 and September 2021 has generated more than 86 000 clicks in total throughout that period Its advertising through QuoraAds has generated some 530 000 impressions in 2021 The

are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed in English with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 8 2021 On November 8 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the

YOUR BALANCE bracelets from Google searches advertisements for Complainant's goods found on social media and a certification from Mark Izen Complainant's manager see also Marquette Golf Club v Al Perkins 1738263 Forum July 27 2017 finding that

is registered with Google LLC Namebay NameCheap Inc Register SPA and Google LLC are collectively hereinafter referred to as the Registrars Similarly the above-listed domain names will be collectively hereinafter referred to as the Domain

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on October 14 2021 On October 18 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

MORGAN STANLEY because i a Google search for webpages that contain both the terms Morgan Stanley and MS yielded over 5 million results ii Complainant's stock has been publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol MS for

of Policy ¶ 4 c ii See Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as ‘Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v nicolas muckensturm Claim Number FA2110001970878   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.  Respondent is nicolas muckensturm

23 2021   On November 23 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the binaxnow.us domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

8 2021   On November 9 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the Domain Name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the Google

Google Trends data indicates that even after Complainant s rebrand to FEDERATED HERMES online users continue to search for HERMES INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Complainant s Hermes Investment Management arm of the company has

was founded in 1998 and the Google search engine has become one of the most highly recognized Internet search services in the world.  Google's primary website is located at google.com and Google also owns and operates hundreds of additional

under Policy ¶ 4 b iv See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that a disputed domain name which resolves to a landing page that distributes malware to Internet users computers demonstrates Respondent's bad faith under

the first response to a Google search for the term is to Complainant While it may be true of the Google entry Complainant is nevertheless one of many other mark holders as already noted Complainant cites Greencraft LLC v Kim James / Mediablue

is not a legitimate use Google Inc v Markus Weiler Francotel Francophone Telecom WIPO Case No D2011-0921 There is no evidence in these Policy proceedings that the Complainant has authorised licensed or permitted the Respondent to register or

domain names see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

¶ 4 c ii See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS record

ter brings up many results on Google none of which relate to the Complainant On Google in Portugal and where the Respondent resides and on www.google.com the Complainant appears only on the third page Only on Google in France with the language set