Policy ¶ 4 a iii see also Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a ‘phishing scheme further established its bad

domain names see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

emblematic of bad faith See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that a disputed domain name which resolves to a landing page that distributes malware to Internet users computers demonstrates Respondent's bad faith under

Jakarta Seoul and Tokyo In Google Play more than 500 million users have downloaded the Tiktok app The Complainants moreover have a large internet presence through its primary websites for these platforms tiktok.com and douyin.com the website

are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on October 11 2021 On October 11 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

Supply Beauty Store Sell on Google Shopping Business Online Dropshipping Business and Map all ending in unacted pages Not only the website is active but it has changed its directory showing different related searches as Listed Products Online

213 640 7976 is an anonymous Google subscriber number   B Respondent Respondent failed to submit a Response in this proceeding   FINDINGS Complainant has rights in the mark BLOCKCHAIN CAPITAL dating back to 2019 and uses it to provide financial

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

different logo Again a simple Google search appears to show that the ORWO block logo was historically applied to items films tapes etc manufactured by the Complainant s predecessors The Respondent has made reference to the logo being similar to a

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on September 23 2021 On September 23 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar

similar to DUCKDUCKGO Google Inc v Trademark Worx LLC a/k/a Richard Yaming FA 1370035 Forum Mar 16 2010 finding googlebrowser.com confusingly similar to GOOGLE Charter Communications Holding Co LLC v Polyakov Andrey FA 1957591 Forum Sept 7

Dominion AA 1 at issue google status.com third party wexheath com Sav postmaster@wexheath   e g Rules 3 0 4 L C wexhealth google-status name CheapCaribbean cheepcaribbean DTAPLES COM dtaples Page Click ICANN s Respondent Complainant Forum

redirect the visitor to the Google Chrome Web Store in order to install a specific program that according to the Complainant was likely malware The disputed domain name zellepayy.com resolved to a landing page that contained security warning

that these appear in a Google search the Respondent does not provide anything in the way of evidence of their use In any event the existence of third party domain names whether or not they or their use infringe the Complainants rights would

  Google LLC v alexandra kepelek Claim Number FA2111001972818   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Griffin Barnett of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is alexandra kepelek Respondent Germany  

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

Complainant has rights in the GOOGLE ANDROID YOUTUBE and GMAIL marks hereinafter the GOOGLE marks through its registrations with multiple trademark agencies including the USPTO e.g GOOGLE Reg 4 123 471 registered Apr 10 2012 ANDROID Reg 4 692 657

of Policy ¶ 4 a I See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world   The

search engines such as Google for the term bulgari or bulgari world lists the Complainant s brand and services as the first result It has a social media presence on all relevant channels The disputed domain name was registered in May 2021

Respondent had carried out a Google search for the term METACAM the search results would have yielded immediate and obvious references to the Complainant In light of these factors it is therefore reasonable to infer that the Respondent either knew