Complainant a search on the Google engine does not feature any link between the Respondent and the term woodbrass Finally the Complainant claims that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith Registered in bad faith

of the search results of a Google search for the Trademark refer to the Complainant The disputed domain name was registered on October 21 2021 and resolves to a website where the domain name is offered for sale for USD 788   PARTIES CONTENTIONS

� 4 c iii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 finding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS record

referred to as the GOOGLE Mark � Complainant claims that Respondent's googlematrix.com disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to Complainant's GOOGLE Mark as it incorporates the mark in its entirety only adding the

similar to WHATSAPP Google LLC v Marcelo Gonzalez / Lionel San Martin FA 1831623 Forum May 9 2019 finding telechargerplaystore.com confusingly similar to PLAY STORE The Panel considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to

into the English language by Google Translate � Complainant points out that Respondent's website prominently displays Complainant's DELL marks and DELL logo Additionally Respondent's website displays Complainant's mark DELL in the web browser tab

in Wordstat and Google Ads According to the Respondent these queries that are actually associated with the Respondent s website The Respondent contends that it has used the slang term капуста Romanized kapusta appropriately for

est enregistré auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte a été déposée en anglais par Alstom auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l Organisation Mondiale de la

the Domain Name via Google Domains for the purpose of solving an account security lockout issue with another email address that Respondent had been using Because of a Google re-verification issue Respondent alleges he no longer had access

engines like the one at Google.com the vast majority of the results relate to Complainant s official websites its social media account or to third party websites that directly refer to the Complainant and its products However it notes that

� Google LLC v Alejandro Greenfield Claim Number FA2111001973409 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.� Respondent is Alejandro Greenfield Respondent

up by the mysteries of a Google algorithm that was searching for material related to any one of the several meanings of the word tips This in turn came from the fact that the Complainant chose as its trademark a common dictionary word which is

amazon I hack you you move to google I hack you Another example is an email on August 17 2021 are u wondering how i am doign it why is zahid not abel to find how i get in ur network will i strike again In case u r wondering I struck already today

resemblance to the well-known Google search engine and which contains the strap line search the divine It says that search results will be shown from bkofficial.com & bkdrluhar.com Its footer contains links to www.babamurli.com 2 and

� Google LLC v hubs Claim Number FA2110001970189 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.� Respondent is hubs Respondent China � REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN

and services under its GOOGLE mark Complainant is the owner of numerous domestic and international registrations for its GOOGLE mark and variations thereof constituting the family of GOOGLE marks Complainant's primary website is located at

1 2021 � On October 1 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the demonware.tech domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

advertising in the form of Google Adds Thus the Respondent generates monetary gains through advertisements on the website at the disputed domain name which exploits the reputation of the Complainant s VST trademark to attract visitors to the

Metz folosind motorul Google search majoritatea rezultatelor obținute vor fi legate de Reclamant și compania pe care acesta o conduce Pârâtul îl cunoștea foarte bine pe Reclamant la momentul înregistrării numelui de domeniu în

the disputed domain name on Google pulls up the Respondent s website which includes only several links that are connected to other various third party websites which are not relevant to the Complainant s business area nor a business which the