affiliate networks such as Google and Yahoo and receiving advertising revenue from searches that reach third-party web pages via its landing pages the content of which the Respondent has asserted is solely controlled by the terms upon which

via their participation in Google Adwords partner network of which we are enrolled in I Garry Marino being the president of a small Florida Corporation Virtual Grace Inc own approximately 200 domain names The nature of our business is Website

in the name Altervista A Google search for the term Altervista produces 7230000 results of which approximately the first twenty relate to the Complainant and its website The disputed domain name has been registered and used by the Respondent

in domain names see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

generated by an automated Google search as being in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services In the Panel view the Respondent is not providing any real service in connection with the Domain Name Furthermore the use is not bona

considering such rights See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also

under the Policy see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant

with the Complainant A Google search for the term Bayer shows that nearly all of the search results refer to the Complainant or its subsidiaries The Complainant has annexed the printouts from the results of the search conducted on June 16

assertions Respondent s googlel.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googlel.com domain name Respondent registered and used the googlel.com

etc Google Inc v Thilak Raj Net Jobs WIPO Case No D2009-0033 National Collegiate Athletic Association and March Madness Athletic Association LLC v Cyberoad Corporation WIPO Case No D2000-1378 or buyacheapacompliaonline.com

United Kingdom Conducting a Google search on this name the Complainant found that the first search result was a link to the website associated with the Domain Name Other search results on Prudential Offshore Services or on the name and contact

fairness the Panel performed Google and Bing searches for CLUB SOCCER together.5 Those searches returned many millions of hits While Complainant organization was listed first in non-advertising rank there was a substantial number of references to

que le référencement sur Google du site internet du Requérant serait bien meilleur que son propre site internet Enfin le Défendeur insiste sur sa bonne foi notamment en justifiant de différentes modifications de son site internet depuis que

by means of the web searcher Google and as a logical conclusion of the current unavailability of the domain in dispute the Panel noticed that there is no possible way for consumers or public in general to become confused between the services

s TD WATERHOUSE name and mark Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 finding googel.com to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark and noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create a distinct mark

office USPTO see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world Complainant

the Complainant referred to a Google translator translation of some of the Chinese language text on the Respondent website as at June 4 2009 which the Complainant alleged consisted of non-sensical gibberish The Google translation of one piece of

dates back to 1991 A simple Google search for francaise des jeux on the Internet would have revealed the existence and notoriety of the denominations francaise des jeux and their association with Complainant as trademark owner In addition

words to such marks see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

complainant s mark see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear