domain name resolves to a Google Safebrowsing Page indicating that the website is potentially harmful The disputed domain name resolves to a website downloading malicious and potentially harmful content on the device of the Internet user which

18 2022   On July 19 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the quietllogistics.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

19 2022   On July 19 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the statefarmev.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

13 2022   On July 14 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the noanintendo.com Domain Name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

12 2022   On July 13 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the sullivancromwe.com and sullcromwells.com domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names.  Google LLC has

July 7 2022   On July 8 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the atlrmetals.com and atinnetals.com domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names.  Google LLC has verified

for commercial gain see also Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent's use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad

Internet search engines like Google.com the vast majority of the results relate to Complainant s official websites or websites directly referring to the Complainant and their products That when conducting searches on online trademark databases no

July 7 2022   On July 7 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the studioautobody.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

registration and use See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wording Sisal or Mooney the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant Therefore it is more than likely that the domain name at issue would not have been registered if

have appeared in a basic Google search on the Internet The Complainant infers therefrom that it is more than likely that the domain name at issue would not have been registered if it were not for Complainant s trademark This is clear evidence

24 2022   On June 27 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the lionsgateplus.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

for the sexican term on Google returns 195 000 results but the first reference to Complainant is on page 3 and is associated not to the term sexycan alone but to Sexycan Clothing   Respondent underlines that the Complaint mainly revolves

googlediscoveryeducation googleeaeth googleearath googleearh googleearht googleeart googleeartch googleeath googleeatrh googleeearth googleerath googleerth googlefights googlefree googlemaaps googlemapsle googlemapx googlemyactivity googlenet

name In fact the results of a Google search of the disputed domain name mostly refer to the Complainant and its activities There is no evidence that the Respondent is or has been commonly known by the disputed domain name or by the term

KAUFMAN BROAD® and a Google search on KAUFMAN BROAD displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant and its related entity KAUFMAN & BROAD S.A The Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Google Nine Claim Number FA2206002002747   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is Google Nine Respondent

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submits as annex to the complaint an extract of a Google search in

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently