¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

filed a copyright notice with Google apparently a reference to a take down notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act DMCA The Respondent did file a counter-notice in response In his Response the Respondent contends that Wikipedia is the

the disputed domain name on Google pulls up the Respondent s Korean blog site which only includes an advertisement for shared house or shared office space Moreover it seems that the disputed domain name was used for a different purpose in 2018

are registered with Google LLC The disputed domain name apexhomelearning.com is registered with 1&1 IONOS SE collectively with Google LLC hereinafter referred to as the Registrars 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on August 28 2021 On August 30 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

reasonably be inferred that a Google or other Internet search would have disclosed the Complainant or if so how prominently In these circumstances the Panel does not consider it can be inferred that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant or

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on August 16 2021 On August 17 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

de co 3 0 4 5 e g 6 60 72 www google com S A word figurative

the term Novartis-Usa in the Google search engine the returned results all pointed to the Complainant and its business activities In view of the Complainant the Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the

a mark under the Policy See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

2021   On September 24 2021 Google LLC confirmed by email to the Forum that the roberthalfcareers.info domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

at Respondent's website.  Google Inc v Gillespie FA1203001434643 Forum May 10 2012 concluding that the domain names googlelivejournal.com googlechiefs.com and googlepoland.com among many others confusingly similar to Complainant's GOOGLE Mark

2021   On September 22 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the blinklogiin.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

Domain Names Further a simple Google search would have disclosed Complainant s website which has prominently featured its PERSONA mark and its Persona Cosmetics company name since as early as May 2017 if not earlier The Internet Archive s Wayback

Additionally all top Google search results for the CANVA and CANVA PRINT terms pertain to Complainant s offerings It is therefore clear that the simplest degree of due diligence i.e a simple Google search would have revealed to Respondent

with search engines such as Google and Baidu for carrefour would yield results only related to the Complainant and/or its affiliates Additionally the Respondent s website redirects Internet users to third-party websites through what appears as

may indicate bad faith See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark suggests Respondent's bad faith Here Complainant provides a copy

all of the results of a Google search of the terms BOUYGUES TRAVAUX PUBLICS refers to the Complainant and its subsidiaries Consequently given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademarks and its reputation it is reasonable in the view

a mark under the Policy See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

on Apple s App Store and Google Play as well as through various websites including www.plus500.com the Complainant s Website The Complainant and members of its Group are proprietors of many registrations and applications for word and