and the domain names see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent s domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

net org info biz eu pl �www google Available-Domain-Names S A N L d b a ITC 1542 2005 N

using search engines such as Google would be misled by the Respondent �s website because it appears alongside references to the Complainant and its services � There is therefore �initial interest confusion � ii The Respondent has �linked the

en el navegador � o en google por motivo de que no piensan en burjerking asi se pronuncia burger king realmente en castellano No nos hemos equivocado esta vaca da mas leche que ninguna aunque sea del vecino y nos diga tontos �Tenemos llena

2004 and began advertising on Google Ad Words in 2005 Complainant began an advertising campaign on Revisions in 2006 and some identical advertising information has been found on Respondent s website Complainant filed a UDRP proceeding against

points to the results of a Google search that it conducted for window film and which yielded approximately 50400 hits These results listed CPFilms as the first hit and llumar.com as the second hit with within the first 300 results additional

lingenfelderwine �www google  D2000-1772 N  3 i e Prolife God info  D2002-0184  D2001-0540  D2002-0030 President CEO and

at the home page for the Google search engine 5 Parties � Contentions A Complainant The Complainant asserts that its SAP marks are well known and famous and that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its marks The Complainant has

par le moteur de recherche Google à partir de requêtes sur la dénomination sociale et les marques du Requérant est le site exploité par le Défendeur et non celui qui était précédemment exploité par le Requérant L �Expert remarque

improve the store position in Google search results that takes months to bear fruit Complainant possesses no rights in the WARGAMES mark for the sale of war-themed games Although Respondent acknowledges seeing Complainant s film during the original

to the word Pig in the Google advertising system Complainant has the top spot because of its continuous efforts to increase recognition of the PIG mark No one even comes close to the Complainant when committing resources to be identified

of Complainant Lastly when a Google search is done for RETAIL RECRUITERS Complainant is the first name which appears on the search list which further goes to prove Respondent �s knowledge of Complainant and its bad faith intent when acquiring the

an affiliate agreement with Google �s AdSense Domain Program Respondent earns a portion of the revenue generated by �clicks � to the links provided by Google �s AdSense Domain Program Respondent displays at the web page located at �globoradio.com

to Policy Paragraph 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world see also Morgan

13 2001 It is irrelevant that Google turned off the advertisements on the Disputed Domain Google did so only upon the request of Complainant and there is no indication that Google rendered any opinion on the trademark issue nor should any opinion

method and to display Google ads clearly with the intention to gain profit from users who were misled to the webpage and click on the Google ads Google ads is a program run by Google where website owners can enroll to enable advertisements

A search on the Internet with Google search engine does not show a single reference to a company other than the Complainant so that both on the market and on the Internet �Barcelo Punta Cana � identifies only the resort of the Barceló Group

a domain name and a mark In Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Nat Arb Forum Apr 26 2002 the panel found the googel.com domain name to be confusingly similar to the complainant s GOOGLE mark noting that t he transposition of two letters does not create

profile For example a Google search dated 25 July 2006 shows 663000 references to Jagex This is a made-up name referable only to the Complainant and indeed all top-ten Google results relate to the Complainant The Complainant turnover over

advertising from Yahoo and Google related to Trekking Respondent claims it was not aware of the change until Complainant brought this proceeding Respondent admits that some of the advertising links resolve to websites of cycle vacation companies