sense can be found with a google.com search of this term in user group postings Further court decisions have stated that common phrases such as bake sale and flea market both very similar to police auction are not eligible for a trade or

consuming public since 1997 Google s GOOGLE mark and name symbolize the tremendous goodwill associated with Google and are property rights of incalculable value Furthermore due to widespread and substantial international use Google s GOOGLE mark

769 463 464 465 852 719 www google

WIPO Case No D2000-1571 Google Inc v Namerental.com and Leonard Bensonoff WIPO Case No D2001-0060 Telstra Corporation Limited v Kandasamy Mahalingam WIPO Case No D2000-0999 and Hobsons Inc and Peter Carrington a/k/a Party Night Inc WIPO case

with Complainant as a Google search has shown Thus the value of the domain name derives not exclusively from the fame of the trademark Ultrafem Inc v Warren R Royal NAF Case No 97682 but from the fact that it is a 3-letter combination

a simple search of the Google Internet search engine reveals thousands of common uses of the phrase summer camps in connection with camps run by many different organizations none of which are in any way related to Complainant Accordingly it

on the Internet search engine Google.com for the word DEANNA yields innumerable third-party web pages iii The Complainant admits that there was a bona fide offering of goods and services when the Complainant describes the content of the web pages

from a cursory Altavista or Google search that PRADA is a famous registered trademark that the Respondent has registered several other domain names similar to famous Italian registered trademarks that the site to which the Internet users are

using the search engine of google.com on January 1 2004 of the words tough love returned 3610000 results At that time only one of the top 100 results was directly related to Complainant Respondent also wishes to point out that no other

search on Altavista or Google would prove that ZEGNA is a famous trademark The Complainants contend that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect to the domain name and they invoke the following arguments There is no

for IKEA for example at Google the engine starts listing main references to the Complainant as being the first results from about 459 000 references to IKEA The sheer number of references to the Complainant s mark is another sign for the fame

from a cursory Altavista or Google search that ERMENEGILDO ZEGNA is a registered trademark that Respondent has registered several other domain names confusingly similar with registered trademarks all redirecting Internet users to a pornographic

for Grace Express in the Google search machine there is no hit meeting this company Grace Express The Complainant tried to contact Grace Express with the enclosed letter via DHL-courier According to a telephone information of this courier

name Bali Discovery Tours A Google search reveals the phrases Bali Discovery and Bali Discovery Tours are widely used by others The claimed mark is generic and therefore unregistrable The Respondent has rights and a legitimate interest in the

result when searched for by Google.com The disputed domain name swatchnews.com was registered with Tucows Inc on December 6 2002 The disputed domain names swatchnews.net and swatchnews.org were registered with @com Technology LLC on April 16 2003

to the majority of people 8 A Google search for anchor beer two words does not show any entry for the domain name A Google search run on anchorbeer showed the domain name as last on the list with the Complainant s website under construction at

주장� 근거 없다 google.com 에서 Virtual World Bank를 � 색한 결과 어떠한 결과도 얻� 못했으며 � �신청인� Virtual World Bank를 � � 명확히 � � �� � 다른 도� 인이름� � � �컨� virtualworldbank.net

search results using the URL Google purchased Applied Semantics in April 2003 and since May 2003 search results have been generated using Google s search engines again under a written contract Respondent asserts that the Disputed Domain Name is a

Señala que en el buscador Google no hay una gran cantidad de referencias Finalmente entiende tener todo el derecho a mantener el dominio en cuestión 6 Debate y conclusiones Es apropiado recordar que de acuerdo con el párrafo 15 a del

KELEMATA and a search on the Google engine revealed 6.480 results for Kelemata almost all concerning Complainant s company and products see Annex 4 The Panel notes that the registration of the disputed domain name by the Respondent was done after