had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submits an extract of a Google search in support of its allegation

per Policy ¶ 4 a iii See Google LLC v Domain Manager FA1755084 Forum Jan 18 2018 finding use of the listentoyoutube.com domain name in association with a website that enabled download of content from Google's YouTube website in violation of

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Sajjad Haider Claim Number FA2107001957521   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.  Respondent is Sajjad Haider Respondent

YOUR BALANCE bracelets from Google searches advertisements for Complainant's goods found on social media and a certification from Mark Izen Complainant's manager Complainant provides evidence of secondary meaning such as the use of the INFORMDX

Domain Name first came from Google Adsense by displaying ads related to small loans Nguyen Thanh Nam then became an agent and affiliate of AccessTrade.vn Second Nguyen Thanh Nam submits that Nguyen Thanh Nam s business from the website under the

by results from the Google Internet search engine Furthermore Complainant emphasizes that Respondent registered a large number 105 of domain names incorporating exact matches of the FACEBOOK or INSTAGRAM trademarks which actions

Complainant s trademarks c.f Google LLC v Suneel Kumar WIPO Case No DNL2019-0053 Consequently the Panel is satisfied that it has been sufficiently established that the disputed domain names were registered and used in bad faith and that the

CAC Case No 102057 Besides a Google search on the term EXPANSCIENCES provides several results all of them being related to the Complainant Before this registration the Respondent could have done a simple Google search and would have found the

domain names see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wording UBI BANCA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submits an extract of a Google search in support of its allegation This raises a clear

to 2018 Complainant provides Google Trends reports showing significant volumes of searches for the term jerkmate starting a few months after Complainant launched its websites Complainant also provides a blog published in 2019 that refers to its

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii   See Google LLC v Domain Manager FA1755084 Forum Jan 18 2018 finding use of the listentoyoutube.com domain name in association with a website that enabled download of content from Google's YouTube website in violation of

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

del motor de búsqueda Google La Demandante ofrece otras utilidades web como Google Maps Google Books Google News Google Cloud entre otros La Demandante es titular de numerosos registros marcarios en diferentes jurisdicciones Entre otras 1

recruitment Actually any Google search on ZIPRECRUITER solely displays results linked to the Complainant Second the Respondent intentionally added the letter v into the disputed domain name The Complainant states that such a misspelling is

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on June 30 2021 On June 30 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request

Also it is said that Google s Safe Growing service reports that the Disputed Domain Name s website is unsafe as it contains harmful content capable of luring Internet visitors into sharing personal information or downloading software 5

and considering that a simple Google search for aperam or even for aperem would have revealed the existence of the Complainant and its trademark the Panel finds that the Respondent who is apparently located in Germany was or could have been aware

a iii 4 b iii and 4 b iv See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark suggests Respondent's bad faith see also H-D U.S.A LLC v