16 2021   On July 19 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the nextbite.us domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

The Panel conducted a Google search using the telephone number appearing on the screenshots of the Respondent s website in Annex B to the Complaint On its own the telephone number produced nothing of relevance but by following it with

The reference to 28 Hilton on Google Maps refers to a hotel The phone number given relates to that of an escort girl In the Panel s view the above evidence is sufficient to establish that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name in bad

Domain Name resolves using Google search this yielded results including now disabled links to Lyrica a pharmaceutical sold by a company called Viatris Anavar a steroid which is manufactured by many companies under its generic name oxandrolone

and • The Panel undertook a google search for the term Argo Blockchain which brought up over 668 000 results among which are numerous references to the Complainant in many media channels worldwide Having considered the above elements the Panel is

name per Policy ¶ 4 b iii See Google LLC v Domain Manager FA 1755084 Forum Jan 18 2018 finding use of the listentoyoutube.com domain name in association with a website that enabled download of content from Google's YouTube website in violation of

Complainant provides Google Analytics and Alexa rankings reports that show Complainant's website receives millions of views per day and is frequently searched for The Panel finds from the fame of the mark and the use made of the domain

purposes of Policy ¶ 4 a i   Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world  

had carried even a basic Google search regarding the word AMEDEI the same would have yielded apparent references to the Complainant This raises a clear inference of knowledge of the Complainant's trademark on the part of the Respondent

factual research comprising Google searches carried out in the United Kingdom via both google.co.uk and google.com for the terms mercado libre and mercadolibre In all cases all of the results returned over at least the first several pages of the

dictionary Furthermore the Google search engine returns results point to the Complainant and its business activities when performing searches for the term STOGGLES In light of the content of the website previously associated with the disputed

Respondent's Website.  See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA 1726692 Forum May 16 2017 finding that the mere existence of a disclaimer on a webpage is not sufficient to confer rights and legitimate interests in a disputed domain

búsqueda en el buscador de Google respecto a la denominación floristería tanatorio Salamanca El Experto no ha podido por tanto encontrar ninguna referencia ni obra en el expediente ninguna evidencia que permita constatar si el referido nombre

name They also share common Google name servers and were registered at the same Registrar Eighth the second and thirteenth disputed domain names recently shared the same Google Analytics account Finally the tenth disputed domain name was created

from an extract from a Google search on hesperide showing numerous results referring to the Complainant Indeed given the ultimate redirection of Internet users from the Domain Name to the Complainant s official website at hesperide.com it is

Family How to Advertise on Google Shopping and Bath Risers These links clearly reference the Complainant s business There is a purported disclaimer statement which states The Sponsored Listings displayed above are served automatically by a third

under Policy ¶ 4 b iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an example of

a iii 4 b iii and 4 b iv See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark suggests Respondent's bad faith see also H-D U.S.A LLC v

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana