29 2021 � On July 29 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the amazonfreestream.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

a popular search term in the Google search engine worldwide just a few months after the date of first use of Complainant's mark and just a few days before the disputed domain name was created for its �typosquatting value � 6 Respondent uses the

position in the Middle East A Google search on the expression TWINNER SPORT displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant and its sporting goods Consequently given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION � Google LLC v Chris Wheeler / helpdeskbuttons.com Claim Number FA2107001954361 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.� Respondent is

under Policy � 4 a iii � See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

under Policy � 4 a iii � See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

July 9 2021 � On July 9 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the statefarrn.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

July 9 2021 � On July 9 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the leidosbio.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

products see also Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark suggests Respondent's bad faith Indeed given that

c ii � See�Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum�Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as �Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in the WHOIS

presumption of bad faith see Google LLC v Aлександр � митрович Бутенко WIPO Case No DUA2020-0009 In this case the disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant s well-known BOOK OF RA trademark and was likely

the Complainant iii a simple Google search would have forwarded the Respondent to the website of the Complainant whose rights are old and well known iv because the gTLD of the disputed domain name directly refers to an activity of the Respondent

such as the Apple Store and Google Play In addition to fxcm.com the Complainant holds numerous domain names based on the FXCM mark including fxcm.asia fxcm.bs fxcm.ba fxcm.capital fxcm.bi fxcm.ceo fxcm.blog fxcm.co.dk fxcm.bo fxcm.co.uk and

prior to registration leads Google to suggest that the search is meant for Swinerton and argues that this is suggestive that the Respondent knew or should have known that its registration would be identical or confusingly similar to the Trademark

behind a privacy service The Google site at the disputed domain name impersonates the Complainants and by holding itself out as based at the address of the Group The Respondent has had a chance to address all respective questions as the

a copy of search results from Google Maps adduced in evidence in an annex to the Complaint which indicates that no such address exists Complainant adds that in fact the address furnished by Respondent makes no sense at all as the address includes

e.g official Facebook Google Twitter Instagram and Pinterest pages In the past several years the brand expanded its catalogue of titles with The Elf on the Shelf A Birthday Tradition as well as with THE ELF ON THE SHELF branded book Elf

for the term natiixis the Google search engine automatically amends the search to show results for natixis instead The Complainant next argues that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Domain Name To

in France When conducting a Google search for the phrase vega investments without quotes the Complainant s website only features at page two of the results If the same search is conducted with quotes the Complainant s website does not appear at

to the Complainant as a Google search would have shown to the Respondent Complainant affirms that this behaviour constitutes bad faith from the Respondent s part The Panel agrees that almost all results for the sign MERIAL in a Google search