and heets on the Baidu and Google search engines direct Internet users to the Complainant and its products which indicates that an exclusive connection between the IQOS and HEETS marks and the Complainant has been established As such the

evidence in the form of a Google search for Nux Info that returns a large number of search results associated with the Complainant However evidence of this sort is potentially problematic and has to be approached with care The reason is that

A copy of a ‘best bison Google search that returns information about Complainant as well as showing its 4.4 star rating out of 444 Google reviews The statement that t hrough extensive use and promotion the BEST BISON mark has become well

LLC the same Hosting Provider Google LLC the same servers the dates of the registration are very near 2016-12-22 and 2017-02-07 both disputed domain names share a similar lay-out of the pay-per-click websites corresponding to the disputed domain

in the disputed domain See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 finding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

under Policy � 4 a i see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent's domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant's GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

May 26 2021 � On May 26 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the lonzagroupag.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

English term and a simple Google search reveals all results and references related to the Complainant s brand Therefore it is reasonable to conclude that the Respondents registered the disputed domain name with the knowledge of the Complainant

results populated on the Google search engine when searching MS These facts especially in combination of the full trademark EATON VANCE in the disputed domain name makes it clear that the full domain name is constructed in order to refer to

of the disputed domain See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

la Unión Europea MUE 1104306 GOOGLE en clases 9 35 38 y 42 Fecha de solicitud 12 de marzo de 1999 Fecha de registro 7 de octubre de 2005 2 MUE 4316642 GOOGLE en clases 16 25 y 35 Fecha de solicitud 29 de marzo de 2005 Fecha de registro 18 de abril

words pumpkin and bank in a Google search refers to the Complainant The Respondent was aware of the Complainant when he registered the disputed domain name The Respondent registered and uses the disputed domain name in bad faith because he offers

May 20 2021 � On May 20 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the arrislogin.com and arrissetup.com domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names.� Google LLC has verified

opportunistic bad faith Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

known by the domain name Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as �Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on April 16 2021 On April 16 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on April 26 2021 On April 27 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submits an extract of a Google search in support of its allegation

as based on the Complainant s Google search there is no company called Enelgree Power and the company that comes up as being the closest hit is the Complainant s Enel Green Power business In short the Complainant says that the Respondent is using