had carried out a basic google search of the words INTESA SANPAOLO and GRUPPO INTESA SANPAOLO the results would have provided obvious reference to the Complainant Accordingly the Complainant contends that there is a clear inference of

la OMPI DECISIà N DEL EXPERTO Google LLC c Laurentius Kenis Caso No DES2021-0008 1 Las Partes La Demandante es Google LLC Estados Unidos de América representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados España E Demandado es Laurentius Kenis España 2 El

PUMA en el motor de búsqueda GOOGLE no se arrojan resultados espontáneos y nada indica que el Titular es o ha sido conocido como PUMA o que exista conexión o relación alguna entre el nombre del Titular y el nombre y marca PUMA Que el Titular no

1.    Respondent's google-airlines.com domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's GOOGLE mark   2.    Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the google-airlines.com domain name   3.    Respondent

and save content from Google's YouTube service in violation of Google's YouTube Terms of Services See also Google Inc v Onur Koycegiz FA1741705 Forum Aug 25 2017 the disputed domain name resolves to a website featuring 10YOUTUBE in a

en el motor de búsqueda Google no se arrojan resultados espontáneos La Demandada no es titular de ningún registro de marca para rotoplas y tampoco es licenciataria de la misma al realizar una búsqueda por titular de registros marcarios a

en el motor de búsqueda Google no se arrojan resultados espontáneos La Demandada no es titular de ningún registro de marca para rotoplas y tampoco es licenciataria de la misma al realizar una búsqueda por titular de registros marcarios a

est enregistré auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte a été déposée par Boursorama S.A auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l Organisation Mondiale de la

media platforms such as Google Facebook Twitter and TIKTOK impose on the population and to expand the conversation to include social media s impact on the economy humanity data privacy lack of transparency and freedom of the press The manner

Respondent had carried out Google search for the names INTESA and INTESA SANPAOLO the search results would have yielded immediate and obvious references to the Complainant It is therefore reasonable to infer that the Respondent either knew or

for Novartiswebinar in the Google search engine the returned results all pointed to the Complainant and its business activities The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the disputed domain name and quickly

disputed domain name.  See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant's GOOGLE mark   The Panel

kunders namn vilket påverkar Googles algoritmer och ökar kundernas sökbarhet I det förevarande fallet hänför man sig till kunder med verksamhet inom välmående och hälsa Innehavaren har understrukit att friskfaktorer är ett generiskt ord

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on March 16 2021 On March 17 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

the disputed domain names See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 5 2021 On February 8 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

featured on the first page of Google search results when searching for arkema are linked to the Complainant section 3.2.2 WIPO Overview 3.0 Therefore the Respondent cannot reasonably dispute that it knew or should have known the ARKEMA trademarks

the first two pages of a Google search on dvag even from a remote location like Australia return results related only to the Complainant Two listings are not for the Complainant but for the 2020 F2 Championship winner whom the Complainant

submits that all the Google results for the expression BOLLORE LOGISTICS refers to the Complainant s subsidiary.The Complainant argues that in the WHOIS database the Respondent attempts to pass off as the Complainant's subsidiary in

submitted that a basic Google search for the words INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA would reveal a reference to the Complainant There appears no reason why an unaffiliated entity would register a domain name that is confusingly similar to the