22 2021   On March 23 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the cabinatworksgroup.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

19 2021   On March 21 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the serhanthomes.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

under Policy ¶ 4 a i See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant's mark does not remove the respondent's domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

Il ajoute qu une recherche Google sur le terme Boursorama affiche plusieurs résultats lesquels sont tous liés au Requérant Dès lors étant donné la distinctivité et la réputation de la marque BOURSORAMA le Requérant soutient que le

en el motor de búsqueda Google efectuada el 8 de diciembre de 2020 iv El Demandado no es titular de ningún registro de la marca ROTOPLAS ni es licenciatario de dicha marca registrada de la Demandante v El Demandado ha enviado cotizaciones

of a search carried out on Google search engine regarding the term NUXE all of them related to the Complainant Should the Respondent have performed a similar search on the Internet before registering the disputed domain name he would have easily

search using the version of Google available in Saudi Arabia for the word magna pertain to the Complainant B Respondent The Respondent denies most of the Complainant's claims asserting among other things that it did not acquire the disputed

la falta de resultados en Google de la Demandante el Experto ha realizado varias búsquedas en Google y en diferentes periodos En especial desde 2006 hasta el 17 de marzo de 2007 constan resultados evidentes de DOCMORRIS como por ejemplo en

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Mingde wang Claim Number FA2103001937336   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA Respondent is Mingde wang Respondent

for Benin as well as a Google search for Vetur Loan but found no results for this name Complainant confirms that it has no business relations with an entity named Vetur Loan and that Respondent is using the trademark MONABANQ without

WIPO Case No D2004-0962 Google Inc v Nijat Hassanov WIPO Case No D2011-1054 In view of the findings above the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has met the requirements under paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate

domain names see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

16 2021   On March 17 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the loandepotpark.com and loandepotstadium.com domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names Google LLC has

will rank number one on Google   For that reason we always advise clients to secure their personal domain names as soon as possible The domain can be used by anyone for anything It's a great asset to have in your control whether used or not

N DEL PANEL ADMINISTRATIVO Google LLC c Laurentius Kenis Caso No D2021-0696 1 Las Partes La Demandante es Google LLC Estados Unidos de América representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados España El Demandado es Laurentius Kenis España 2 El Nombre

names have been flagged by Google s Safe Browsing service as unsafe On January 25 2021 the Complainant sent a notice to the Respondent by email via the privacy service through which the disputed domain names had been registered requesting

by the results of a search on GOOGLE s search engine which have been presented in an annex to the Complaint The Complainant contends therefore that the registrant of the disputed domain name which is identical to its mark and its associated domain

findings relate to one domain googlephotographer.scot There is one Complainant and one or more Respondent s and no domain names were dismissed from this Complaint   The Respondent has registered the domain name googlephotographer.scot   Complainant

Complainant provides Google Maps evidence showing that the admin address is an empty lot in North Salt Lake UT  Complainant further asserts that Respondent is not authorized to use Complainant's CITADEL mark  The Panel finds that