going to begin taking out Google ads promoting their and Dairy Farm Group s alleged practices There is evidence that these ads are in fact being published if someone were to search on the executive s name 5 Discussion and Findings Paragraph 4 a

hoog gerangschikt in Google-resultatenlijsten Volgens Eiser adverteert Verweerder op Google om boven de website van Eiser gerangschikt te staan Dat onderstreept de kwade trouw van Verweerder volgens Eiser Doordat Verweerder dezelfde term

such as Search Website Google Search Website and How to Get a Replacement Birth Certificate Several of the domain names also redirect users to a website that prompts them to download a browser extension Complainant persuasively argues that

and save content from Google's YouTube service in violation of Google's YouTube Terms of Services See also Google Inc v Onur Koycegiz FA1741705 Forum Aug 25 2017 the disputed domain name resolves to a website featuring 10YOUTUBE in a

Apple s App Store and the Google Play store Through these means the Complainant has made available news and information about its competitions teams in its league game schedules and made available for purchase merchandise According to the

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of INTESA SANPAOLO and BANCA INTESA SANPAOLO the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant This raises a clear inference of knowledge of the Complainant s trademark on the

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

des résultats naturels de Google lorsque l internaute insère les mots pharmashop serait un indice supplémentaire du fait qu il n existe aucune confusion possible La Défenderesse en concluant qu en initiant une telle procédure la

trtspor a cursory search on Google for the Complainant s trademark yields pages of results pertaining to the Complainant the first page of which only features links associated with the Complainant Further it stretches credulity to believe the

has provided print outs of Google searches on a wide range of terms relevant to its business such as Demand Generation Lead Generation B2B Demand Generation B2B Lead Generation Binary Demand Content Syndication and ABM Leads which show the

store Apple App Store and Google Play Store and which currently has over 1 million downloads This application enables tablet or smartphone users with active pens to write and edit their handwritten notes in real-time It has been named the

¶ 4 a i   Respondent's googlepis.com domain name contains Complainant's GOOGLE trademark followed by the term pis a term which according to Complainant appears to refer to GOOGLEAPIS Google application programming interfaces with all

of 35.186.238.101 all have Google as their host for Internet connectivity all are configured with no MX mail server records and all have NS name server records pointing to smartname.com   All the disputed domain names resolve to similar websites

It provides evidence that a Google search for ROCKSTAR GAMES will produce almost 14 million hits and states that its website at www.rockstargames.com has been visited over 800 million times since inception The Complainant states that its Grand

are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 31 2020 On January 4 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 30 2020 On December 30 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

Forum July 28 2016 and   Google Inc v Wei Zhang FA1403001551141 Forum May 6 2014   In the absence of any Response these circumstances satisfy the Panel that Respondent is likely to be conversant with English that there would be no undue

cabinet a simple search on Google or Bing for coupon cabinet immediately turns up results for Complainant and its COUPONCABIN mark To the Panel this is revealing given that COUPONCABIN is a coined term It is true that a search for coupon cabinet

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 14 2020 On December 14 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a