are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 15 2020 On December 16 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

сервіс Google не пов язу� Позивача із позначенням SKYENG Позивач не набув права на незаре� стровану торговельну марку SKYENG Позивач

КОМІСІЇ Google LLC проти Николаенко �'иктор Александрович / Nikolaienko Victor Aleksandrovych Справа № DUA2020-0032 1 Сторони Позивачем � Google LLC Сполучені

legal name Citing Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

name since at least 1999 Google searches for northern trust and northern trust fund lead to prominent listings of Complainant s primary website and other sites that discuss Complainant and/or its services The disputed domain name was created

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 17 2020 On December 18 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

17 2021 � On February 17 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the juul2.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION � Google LLC v Suraj Kumar Claim Number FA2102001932216 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.� Respondent is Suraj Kumar Respondent India �

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 3 2020 On December 4 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 5 2021 On February 8 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

Policy � 4 b iii see also Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an example of

Service Inc./ ROBERT GREEN/ GOOGLE TEAM WIPO Case No D2013-2100 and to provide any evidence of actual or contemplated good-faith use In addition the Respondent apparently provided false contact details at the registration of the disputed domain

to a safety warning from Google informing internet users that attackers on belfius.site may trick them into doing something dangerous such as installing software or revealing their personal information The Complainant s trademark registrations

both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store Complainant owns trademark registrations for GIVELIFY including United States trademark registration no 4491096 GIVELIFY fig filed on July 26 2013 and registered on March 4 2014 for goods in

for Novartis Careers in the Google search engine the returned results all pointed to the Complainant and its business activities The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the Disputed Domain Name and would

per click D2001 0376 at issue google status.com Toronto Dominion parties long term well known USA � onbaseonlin com name postmaster@onbaseonlin e g mark Rules 3 0 4 hacrs Respondent google-status esecuretdbank parties �Using Page Click ICANN s

est enregistré auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte a été déposée par COLAS auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l Organisation Mondiale de la Propriété

the Complainant argues that a Google search on the expression ROLAND GARROS displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant and the tournament Consequently given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademarks and its

� 4 c i or � 4 c iii see also Google Inc v Petrovich FA1008001339345 Forum Sep 23 2010 Respondent's failure to make an active use of the disputed domain names except for the purpose of downloading malicious computer software is not a use in

that all of the top Google search results for eleanor macfarlane identify websites or social media services associated with the Complainant With reference to rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name the