Facebook Pinterest Tumblr Google Site and Twitter Clicking on the Twitter and Tumblr icons Internet users are redirected to accounts of khushi sharma where Mcafee and Webroot Antivirus are promoted and by clicking on the posts dedicated to

directly or misspelled Google searches annexed to the Complaint reveal that any search over weight watchers or over the disputed domain names solely provides results connected to the Complainant The Complainant also underlines that the

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA and INTESA SANPAOLO the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant Furthermore the disputed domain name is not used for any bona fide offerings as the

not affect these findings See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA 1726692 Forum May 16 2017 finding that the mere existence of a disclaimer on a webpage is not sufficient to confer rights and legitimate interests in a disputed domain

per Policy � 4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant's mark does not remove the respondent's domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation to the

rights in the mark See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA 1591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant's

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

en el motor de búsqueda Google no se arrojan resultados espontáneos El Titular no ha utilizado el nombre de dominio en disputa en un contexto de buena fe de oferta de productos o servicios y no hace un uso legítimo y leal o no comercial del

for the term h-m via Google first results triggered relate to the trade mark H&M Then there is the addition of the TLD pw As is generally accepted the addition of a TLD such as pw is merely a technical registration requirement and as such

name Furthermore a simple Google search against the wordings INTESA and INTESA SANPAOLO would have revealed several findings unequivocally associated with the Complainant Therefore it is more than likely that the disputed domain name would not

its non-use Screenshots of Google search results for INTESA SANPAOLO A letter from Complainant to Respondent dated 24 June 2020 requesting transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant Various WIPO ADR decisions concerning similar

en el motor de búsqueda de Google están relacionados con la Promovente y con su marca comercial la Promovente fue fundada en 1924 y sus marcas son utilizadas previo al año 2010 10 Como consecuencia de lo anterior es razonable inferir que el

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 4 2021 On January 4 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

industry along with Google Apple Amazon and Facebook and that in 2020 its revenues were almost USD 143.000 million and its ranked number 21 in the 2020 Fortune 500 rankings of the largest United States corporations by total revenue The

12 2021 � On February 13 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the wahllgmbh.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

25 2021 � On January 26 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the snapalva.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 8 2020 On December 9 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

of registration Even a basic Google search in respect of the wording INTESA and INTESA SANPAOLO would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant It is more than likely that the disputed domain name would not have been registered if it were

� Google LLC v Milen Radumilo Claim Number FA2102001930756 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Fabricio Vayra of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA Respondent is Milen Radumilo Respondent Romania �

word geico on the Baidu and Google search engines direct Internet users to the Complainant and its products/services which indicates that an exclusive connection between the GEICO mark and the Complainant has been established As such the