WIPO Case No D2004-0962 Google Inc v Nijat Hassanov WIPO Case No D2011-1054 In view of the finding above the Panel is satisfied that the Complainant has met the requirements under paragraph 4 a i of the Policy B Rights or Legitimate Interests

disputed domain name A simple Google search of Respondent s name shows no result relating to any use of the previred term Respondent s disputed domain name and website create a false association with Complainant s marks attracting Internet users

the letter i   Respondent's googleplaysetvices.com googledocsusercontent.com googlecameramod.com google-avscan.com btgoogle.cc and avgoogle.net domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant's GOOGLE mark as they entirely incorporate the

per click long term at issue google status.com Toronto Dominion USA   wahlcorp com name postmaster@wahlcorp e g Rules 3 0 4 google-status esecuretdbank parties  Using Above products confusion Page Click ICANN s Respondent Complainant Forum name

mark Finally all the Google results for a search of the term BOURSORAMA are related to the Complainant Thus the Complainant contends that the Respondent has registered and used the domain name boursorama.link with full knowledge of the

digitales tales como Google Maps Google Books Google News Google Cloud o Google Photos Este último servicio fue lanzado por la Demandante en 2015 y se ha convertido en una de las herramientas más populares para el almacenaje de fotos y

up as the first result on a Google search for the mark it is most likely that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant s SITA mark when it registered the disputed domain name It says that in the circumstances it appears likely to the

advertisements using the Google AdSense program on a pay-per-click PPC basis UDRP panels have found that use of a domain name to host a parked page comprising PPC links does not represent a bona fide offering where such links compete with or

such as MICROSOFT PAYPAL GOOGLE and the like 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant Complainant contends that it has satisfied all three elements required under the Policy for a transfer of the Domain Names B Respondent Respondent asserts that

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Vlads Galinovs Claim Number FA2012001926271   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.  Respondent is Vlads Galinovs Respondent

  Google LLC v zhijiang kun Claim Number FA2012001926346   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is zhijiang kun Respondent China   REGISTRAR AND

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Y Aioanei Dablanca German Claim Number FA2012001926270   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by John C Nishi of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA.  Respondent is Y Aioanei Dablanca

Complainant has presented a Google search on the expression GRUPPO INTESA SANPAOLO that provides several results all of them being linked with the Complainant What s even more interesting is that the same results appeared when the Panel carried

and previously triggered a Google Chrome security warning stating that attackers might be trying to steal your information from arcelormittal.tech for example passwords messages or credit cards and that the presence of such a notice demonstrates

to a safety warning from Google 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant The Complainant contends that each of the three elements specified in paragraph 4 a of the Policy are satisfied in the present case as follows a The disputed domain name is

insman.net is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 27 2020 On November 30 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Jiri Capcuch Claim Number FA2012001926089   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Fabricio Vayra of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.  Respondent is Jiri Capcuch Respondent

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

media articles and the Google Trends report to demonstrate secondary meaning and common law rights in the PORNHUB mark Therefore the Panel finds that Complainant has established common law rights in the PORNHUB mark   Complainant argues