per oggetto la denominazione GOOGLE tra le quali Registrazione di Marchio dell Unione Europea n 001104306 GOOGLE del 7 ottobre 2005 Registrazione di Marchio dell Unione Europea n 004316642 GOOGLE del 18 aprile 2006 Il Ricorrente è anche titolare

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 14 2020 On November 16 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

than 500 million users in Google Play and is ranked as 1 in Entertainment in the Apple Store and 3 in Social in Amazon The official website of the Complainant for its TikTok platform is located at the domain name tiktok.com According to

Facebook and second only to Google its US reach at 83.9 leads all others including Google Complainant and its affiliates now employ over 1 300 people with offices in New York Los Angeles London Paris Madrid Berlin Mexico City Tel Aviv New Delhi

platforms and mobile apps on Google Playstore and App Store with over 500 000 installations The Complainant is the registered proprietor of the trade mark RELIANCE NIPPON LIFE ASSET MANAGEMENT under Indian Registration No 3599328 dated July 26

platforms and mobile apps on Google Playstore and App Store with over 500 000 installations The Complainant is the registered proprietor of the trade mark RELIANCE NIPPON LIFE ASSET MANAGEMENT under Indian Registration No 3599328 dated July 26

which appeared to offer a Google Chrome extension for download The Complainant also exhibits a report from Network Solutions dated August 21 2020 indicating that the disputed domain name was available for immediate purchase for the price of USD

under Policy ¶ 4 a iii   See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

in similar circumstances Google LLC v Host Master / Transure Enterprise Ltd FA 1877994 Forum Feb 8 2020 same   Complainant has made a prima facie case that Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests in the domain name and Respondent has

como la suite ofimática Google Drive el correo electrónico GMail el navegador de Internet Google Chrome las herramientas en línea Google Maps Google Street View y Google Earth el sitio web de vídeos YouTube entre otros La Demandante lidera

downloaded the TikTok app in Google Play The app is ranked as 1 in Entertainment in the Apple Store and 3 in Social in Amazon The Complainant also has a large Internet presence through its primary website tiktok.com According to SimilarWeb.com

lacks rights in a mark See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on October 22 2020 On October 23 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

to Complainant because a Google search of the disputed domain name returns results for Complainant and disregarding the company generic Top-Level Domain gTLD the disputed domain name is identical to the DEWBERRY trademark and it incorporates

For example a simple Google search on the Respondent s name reveals that a company report by an organisation called EMIS is available inexpensively for a company having the Respondent s name and address as at January 2020.2 Another report

on that website.  See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

basic and advanced aspects of Google Ads There are six Google Ads certifications available Google Ads Search Google Ads Display Google Ads Video Shopping ads Google Ads Apps and Google Ads Measurement Google Ads certification allows individuals to

per Policy ¶ 4 a iii   See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a ‘phishing scheme further established its bad

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v LiShiMin Claim Number FA2012001924730   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is LiShiMin Respondent China  

under Policy ¶ 4 b iii   See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark suggests Respondent's bad faith   Complainant also argues