is confusingly similar to the GOOGLE Mark First it is uncontroverted that the Complainant has established trademark rights in the GOOGLE Mark based on its long and continuous use globally The Disputed Domain Name googled.co consists of the GOOGLE

had carried out even a basic Google search in respect of INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant This raises a clear inference of knowledge of the Complainant s trademark on the part of the

under Policy ¶ 4 a i see also Google Inc v Xtraplus Corp D2001-0125 WIPO Apr 16 2001 finding that the respondent's domain names were confusingly similar to Complainant's GOOGLE mark where the respondent merely added common terms such as buy or gear

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

PublicDomainRegistry.com Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names.  PDR Ltd d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the PDR Ltd d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com Google LLC

Complainant s prominence in Google search results suggests that the Respondent was aware of the Trademarks at the time of registration of the Disputed Domain Name As noted in section 3.3 of the WIPO Overview 3.0 previous UDRP panels have

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on October 21 2020 On October 22 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA and INTESA SANPAOLO the same would have yielded apparent references to the Complainant The Complainant submits an extract of a Google search in support of its allegation

towards banks The reason Google searches for Open Bank only show a few results could be because of the Petitioner s efforts to take over the term due to its trademark protection A thorough review regarding this was not made prior to the

or tradename A simple Google search on hexatronic or a simple trademark search would have disclosed the Complainant s HEXATRONIC trademark Consequently the Respondent does not have rights or a legitimate interest in respect of the Disputed

English language including a Google translation tool to many languages allegedly offering investment services related to various projects in the agricultural field seeds and chemical products for agriculture This website includes in the left side

a search for Maggie Sotero on Google leads to results relating exclusively to the Complainant including where the word Sottero has been misspelled as Sotero The Complainant relies on paragraph 2 of the Policy which provides that it is registrants

5 2020   On November 6 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the rickandmortystuff.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

appears as the only result in Google search when searching for PALANTIR ii The word element PALANTIRY represents almost identical version of the Complainants registered trademarks PALANTIR where the addition of the repetitive end letter Y at the

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

5 2020   On November 6 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the coronaviruswalgreens.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that

em disputa Uma pesquisa no Google com os termos arenaneoquimica ou neoquimicaarena indica apenas referências ao estádio e à marca da Reclamante nas páginas iniciais de resultados Portanto o Especialista conclui que definitivamente não é

the disputed domain names A Google search using the terms arenaneoquimica or neoquimicaarena indicates only references to the stadium and to the Complainant s mark on the initial result pages Therefore the Panel concludes that it is definitely

de diversas facturas de Google de 2 de febrero y 1 de marzo de 2019 las cuales fueron emitidas por servicios de publicidad digital Google Ads Por ello es más que evidente el uso previo que de buena fe el Titular realizó y sigue realizando

available evidence A brief Google search for the Respondent s name was conducted as permitted under section 4.8 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions Third Edition WIPO Overview 3.0 The search yielded an entry