7 2020   On October 7 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the statefarminsuranceclaim.org domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that

under the Policy See Google LLC v Chen Weilong FA1803596 Forum Sept 24 2018 Further the ‘.com or ‘.net gTLD are typically disregarded in the confusing similarity analysis as these gTLDs rarely add any substantive meaning to a domain name  

¶ 4 c ii   See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

6 2020   On October 6 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the statefarmmedicalinsurance.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.  Google LLC has verified that

under the Policy See e.g Google LLC v Sihao Wang FA 1898320 Forum June 26 2020 finding lack of rights or interests in similar circumstances   Complainant has made a prima facie case that Respondent lacks rights and legitimate interests in the

No °5129176 natixis fr www google e g 3 0 1 4 websites products

mark Finally all the Google results for a search of the terms BOURSORAMA FR are related to the Complainant Thus the Complainant contends that the Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name boursorama-fr.com with full

searched for Novartis in the Google search engine the returned results all pointed to the Complainant and its business activities The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the disputed domain name and would

used and When searching in Google the word CMSO only results related to the Complainant appear Secondly the Complainant point out that Respondent intended to use the Domain Names for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with the

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION   Google LLC v Vitzo Limited Claim Number FA2009001913310   PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Brian J Focarino of Cooley LLP District of Columbia USA Respondent is Vitzo Limited Respondent

its allegedly customer base Google searches for the disputed domain name and the Complainant s trademark reveal that there is not any kind of diversion of Internet traffic Annex 8 to the Response the Complainant is based in France the Respondent

on January 11 2020 regarding Google's efforts to provide data storage for Cerner Corporation's health records the WHOIS record shows that the disputed domain name was created on January 12 2020 the very next day Thus Respondent had actual or

me that really want to use Google Stadia and pay Google the full Google price to be able to use Google's Stadia and encourage more gamers to use Google services and like any other VPN service charge for the VPN part   The email mentioned

2020   On September 28 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the stadiavpn.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

are registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on August 25 2020 On August 25 2020 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submits as Annex D an extract of a Google search in support of its

2020   On September 17 2020 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the astrogamer.net domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name  Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

en el motor de búsqueda de Google no produjo ningún resultado viii El nombre de dominio en disputa fue registrado mucho tiempo después de que la Promovente obtuviera en México no menos de catorce registros de la marca NASCAR ix La Titular

on search engines such as Google or Bing would have revealed Complainant s adoption and use of the PRIORITY GOLD mark for similar precious metal-related services While the Panel does not accept Complainant s view that Respondent is operating a

also submits that a Google search for Khadi shows hundreds of results of which only handful are related to the Complainant The Respondent contends that it is a common term adopted by various companies around the world with the majority of