Comments

• DomainArts (Nat Cohen) 03:21 pm 25-Jun-2013 While the decision might be a fair outcome, I believe the panelist should have denied the complaint as not being appropriate to a UDRP dispute. It is clearly a contract dispute. The Complainant paid fees to the Respondent for the services it performed. The domain was originally transferred to respondent as part of the work it performed. This is not a clear cut case of cybersquatting. This is another instance of a panelist who can't resist exercising the power he has been granted, when he should have exercised restraint instead.