the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH specifically the Benelux Trademark Reg No 781420 for LUXURY COLLECTION and the CTM Trademark Reg No 154500 for THE LUXURY COLLECTION Because these marks are registered with the TMCH Complainants assert that when

the Trade Mark Clearing House TMCH since 16 April 2014 Thus the Respondent was necessarily aware of the trademark when he registered the disputed domain name The Complainant refers to previous decisions in which other panels confirmed the notoriety

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH ; the Mark s status with the TMCH is VERIFIED As part of the process of registering the Mark with TMCH Add2Net ownership of the Registrations was demonstrated to and its submission of evidence of use was

is also registered in the TMCH since April 16th 2014 The domain names include the trademark PRADAXA in its entirety The addition of the new gTLD XYZ is not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain names are confusingly similar to the

a trademark registered in the TMCH The circumstances of the matter demonstrate that the Registrant registered the domain names in order to prevent the Complainant from reflecting their trademark in a corresponding domain name Also the WHATSAPP

Clearinghouse TMCH 注册该商标ALSTOM� � 4.2 被投诉人 被投诉人几乎� �� 位于中国的个人� � 4.3 争议域名 争议域名注册于2015年9月16日� � 4.4 争议域名网站

is registered before TMCH When Respondent attempted to register the three domain names that are at issue in this dispute he would have received a warning notice from the TMCH with each one as part of its Trademark Claims service Despite

record submitted to the TMCH and if you continue with this registration you represent that you have received and you understand this notice and to the best of your knowledge your registration and use of the requested domain name will not

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH The Complainant and its subsidiaries own hundreds of domain name registrations containing the trade mark BAYER including bayer.com and bayer.com.cn The disputed domain name was registered on September 17 2015 It

has been registered with the TMCH since October 3rd 2013 The disputed domain name is identical to Complainant word mark URS 1.2.6.2 Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name Determined Finding for Complainant Registrant has

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH Thus the CITIGROUP mark triggers Trademark Claims Notices to any would-be domain name registrant attempting to register a domain name in any new generic top level domain during the gTLD s Trademark Claims period

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH since July 12 2013 The Complainant owns many domain names including its distinctive such as salomon.com and salomon.ru The disputed domain name salomon.moscow was registered on July 13 2015 5 Parties Contentions A

Trademark Clearinghouse the TMCH Although this is not disputed there is no attempt to explain why the fact that the mark was registered in the TMCH is of significance in these proceedings The Panel suspects that what the Complainant may be trying

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH A letter was sent to the Respondent by the Complainant external counsel on July 8 2015 notifying the Respondent of the Complainant rights in the Starwood Marks It requested that the Respondent agree to voluntarily

1 The Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH is a rights protection mechanism built into ICANN new gTLD program It is a centralized database of verified trademarks that is connected to each and every new Top Level Domain TLD that will launch When someone

the Trade Mark with the TMCH The TMCH is a repository of verified trade mark information If a party attempts to register a domain name in a new gTLD which exactly matches a trade mark registered in the TMCH that party is alerted to the

a trademark registered in the TMCH The circumstances of the matter demonstrate that the Registrant registered the domain name in order to prevent the Complainant from reflecting their trademark in a corresponding domain name Finally the domain does

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH The Complainants are one of the world leading hotels and/or leisure companies in the world with over 1100 properties in approximately 100 countries WESTIN hotels were introduced in1981 and are located in over 30

the Trade Mark Clearing House TMCH since January 28 2015 The Complainant owns and communicates on the Internet through various websites worldwide Its main website is www.remy-cointreau.com with corresponding domain nameregistered on October 7 1996

the Trademark Clearing House TMCH Moreover Complainant has evidenced to be the owner inter alia of the domain names sheraton.com as well as sheratonhotels.com which redirect to Complainant s official websites enabling Internet users to make

the TradeMark ClearingHouse TMCH since 2013 URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to prove by clear and convincing evidence each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be suspended URS 1.2.6.1 The

in current use by way of the TMCH SMD file submitted NO RIGHTS OR LEGITIMATE INTERESTS The Respondent is not commonly known by â ��URBAN OUTFITTERSâ �￾ name The Complainant has neither licensed nor authorized Respondent to use � its trademark

is registered with the TMCH when Respondent attempted to register the domain name that is in issue in this dispute greubelforsey.club he would have received a warning noticeâ �� from the TMCH as part of its Trademark Claims service Despite

is registered with the TMCH when Respondent attempted to register the five domain names that are at issue in this dispute Timex.gallery timex.international timex.company timex.center and timex.boutique the Domain Names he would have received

a trademark registered in the TMCH The circumstances of the matter demonstrate that the Registrant registered the domain name in order to prevent the Complainant from reflecting their trademark in a corresponding domain name Also the MISS UNIVERSE

and which is duly verified by TMCH The BLOOMBERG trademark is recognized worldwide Complainant has claimed that the domain name in question is identical to their protected word mark that the Respondent has no legitimate right or interests to the

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH which means that when the Respondent attempted to register the disputed domain name he would have received a warning notice from the TMCH In addition the Complainant has registered domain names reflecting its

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH and highlights that therefore when the Respondent attempted to register the disputed domain name it has received a warning notice from the concerned registrar and despite having received said notice proceeded with

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH the Marks status with the TMCH is VERIFIED URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to prove by clear and convincing evidence each of the following three elements to obtain an order that a domain name should be

a trademark registered in the TMCH Finally the domain does not lead to any active website The Registrant therefore does not show bona fide offering of goods or services Examiner finds that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH or the Uniform Rapid Suspension System URS mechanisms which were available in relation to the toys gTLD The Respondent relies on the fact that he says the Complainant took no steps to proactively protect its brand

a trademark registered in the TMCH The circumstances of the matter demonstrate that the Registrant registered the domain name in order to prevent the Complainant from reflecting their trademark in a corresponding domain name Finally the domain does

are registered in the TMCH Respondent registered the disputed domain name despite having received a notification stating that the domain name matches a trademark registered in the TMCH Finally the domain name resolves to a click through

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH as a result of which the Respondent would have been given a trademark claims notice of the Complainant s rights in the VOLKSWAGEN trade mark 3 The disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith

the TradeMark ClearingHouse TMCH since November 26th 2013 The wording SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC is related only with the Complainant The new gTLD PARIS associated with the trademark SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC refers to the Complainant activity in the city of

the TradeMark ClearingHouse TMCH Further the trademark is used on the Complainant s website www.corporate.arcelormittal.com In the email dated February 24 2015 Respondent expressed its will to resolve the case amicably Namely it offered to

Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH 中注册的商标ALSTOM相同� �ALSTOM� �国际驰名商标� �被投诉人注册与之相同的争议域名，� �为了� �过该商标商誉，获得不� 利益� �

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH but Respondent persisted with the registration of the disputed domain name despite having been sent a warning notice from the TMCH of Complainant trade mark The cumulative circumstances strongly suggest

are registered in the TMCH prior to the Respondentâ � �s domain names being registered Bad Faith is pleaded on the ground that the Respondent registered the domain names despite having received notification that the domain names matched

a trademark term in the TMCH ii If after receiving and accepting the notice the domain name registrant does continue to register the domain name the trademark holder with a corresponding mark in the Clearinghouse receives a notification of

a trademark term in the TMCH ii If after receiving and accepting the notice the domain name registrant does continue to register the domain name the trademark holder with a corresponding mark in the Clearinghouse receives a notification of

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH that the Respondent registered the disputed domain names blackanddecker.email and dewalt.email Although through the TMCH Claims Notification process Respondent had received prior notification of the existence of

LOMBAX is also registered in TMCH clearinghouse LOMBAX® is a lumbar support belt with locking system into two parts See http //www2.thuasne.fr/thuasne/front/site/france/lang/fr/pid/768 The New GTLD « BLUE » makes reference to the color of

have been notified through TMCH system of NISSAN trademark rights when registering nissan.repair which is famous all over the world 2.The Respondent has made no use of the domain in connection with any bona fide offering of goods or services in

to the Respondent by the TMCH when he applied for the domain name carvel.nyc Even though the Respondent has defaulted URS Procedure 1.2.6 requires Complainant to make a prima facie case proven by clear and convincing evidence for each of the

ICANN Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH on August 27 2013 Complainant explains that as a result of the TMCH registration and the so-called Claims Service any registrant including Respondent receives a warning notice when attempting to register a domain

has been notified to the TMCH he must have been clearly informed of the Complainantâ � �s s prior trademark rights when he confirmed his decision to register the disputed domain name The domain name has been registered in bad faith with the

noms de domaine qui est le TMCH Trademark Clearinghouse qui est le nouveau mode de protection des marques sur internet D autres unités d enregistrement ont par ailleurs mis en place des mécanismes de protection des droits RPM tels que la

this trademark in the TMCH Clearinghouse Respondent registered the disputed domain name despite receiving a notification that the domain name matches a trademark registered with the Clearinghouse Respondent at the time of the registration

have been notified through TMCH system of the Complainant trademark rights when registering MITSUBISHI.REVIEWS which is famous all over the world The Respondent has made no use of the domain in connection with any bona fide offering of goods or

BPE is also registered in TMCH clearinghouse New GTLD EMAIL associated with the trademark BPE refers to the communication offered by the Complainant to his customers B Registrant has no legitimate right or interest to the domain name The

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH Complainant owns additional trademark registrations including U.S Reg Nos 2699371 3762299 and 3989089 and registrations covering at least five other jurisdictions as evidenced in Annex A Complainant also owns and

the Trademark Clearing House TMCH when it applied to register the disputed domain names See Exhibit O to the Complaint There is no reason that Respondent can point to that would support its need to register the disputed domain names as it has

the Trademark Clearing House TMCH NIC HANDLE 0006110000000724-1 Moreover Complainant demonstrated that his official website is always placed at the highest positions in internet search results Respondent has not proven otherwise NO RIGHTS OR

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH and highlights that therefore when the Respondent attempted to register the disputed domain name it has received a warning notice from the concerned registrar and despite having received said notice proceeded with

the Trademark Clearinghouse TMCH so as to protect it against cybersquatting meaning that the Respondent persisted with the registration of the disputed domain name despite receipt of a warning notice from the TMCH and knowing that the

of Complainant mark in the TMCH as part of the registration process and proceeded to register the domain name nevertheless the inference that Respondent purpose was to sell the domain name to Complainant at a profit is compelling URS 1.2.6.3 a

receiving notification by the TMCH that the domain name identically matches the Complainantâ � �s Trademark Until recently the domain names were linked to the websites used for the pay-per-click links with sponsored links to the goods and services

receiving notification by the TMCH that the domain name identically matches the Complainantâ � �s Trademark Until recently the domain name was linked to the website stelapps.com offering software applications for mobile devices e.g smartphones In

the marks status with the TMCH is VERIFIED On February 13 2014 Dana was notified by the TMCH that its mark was included in a registered domain name dana.holdings Dana was concerned that the use of the mark DANA especially in connection with