| 1264365 | aip.com | Ric Jo Swaningson | thu lins | UDRP | 01-Jul-2009 |
| Entered on 19-Jul-2009 08:12pm @udrptv - According to the complaint, the domain was hijacked from the complainant. |
| D2009-0918 | heineken.tel | Heineken España, SA | Antonio Rodriguez Fernandez Pacheco | | 15-Sep-2009 |
| Entered on 13-Jul-2009 04:27pm @gricetti - I think it's enough that the domain owner is trying to associate itself with "beer" [...] |
| D2009-0918 | heineken.tel | Heineken España, SA | Antonio Rodriguez Fernandez Pacheco | | 15-Sep-2009 |
| Entered on 10-Jul-2009 08:10am For a good time, call HEINEKEN.TEL?
Maybe the owner wanted to impress the ladies while downing a few cold [...] |
| D2009-0570 | thejaylenoshow.com | Jay Leno | Guadalupe Zambrano | | 25-Jun-2009 |
| Entered on 02-Jul-2009 08:12pm Javier - You're missing the point... Jay Leno “licenced” his trademark to NBC/GE. He didn't “sell” it [...] |
| 1261774 | mothersmilk.com | Traditional Medicinals, Inc. | Cimino Brothers Produce | UDRP | 22-Jun-2009 |
| Entered on 30-Jun-2009 06:10pm Passive holding of an inactive generic name is NOT bad faith.
What planet is the arbitrator, Carolyn Marks [...] |
| 1252746 | texaswindworks.com | Texas Wind Power Company | Wind Works c/o Savvy Dog Design, LLC | UDRP | 12-May-2009 |
| Entered on 15-May-2009 07:09pm Technically, I would have to say it's not.
The panelist made a bad judgment call on similarity and should [...] |
| 1261545 | cheapautoinsurance.com | Combined Insurance Group Ltd | Xedoc Holding SA c/o domain admin | UDRP | 26-Jun-2009 |
| Entered on 14-May-2009 06:09pm Unless I'm missing something here, I predict the complainant will lose. |
| 1261538 | cheapautosinsurance.com | Combined Insurance Group Ltd | iclicks c/o Michael Mayder | UDRP | 25-Jun-2009 |
| Entered on 14-May-2009 05:39pm Unless I'm missing something here, I predict the complainant will lose. |
| 1246846 | deacom.com | Deacom Inc. c/o Jay Deakins | Deacom c/o Ben Dean | USDRP | 14-Apr-2009 |
| Entered on 13-May-2009 03:49pm I don't get it; if the respondent has a corporation matching the name of his domain, then why did he [...] |
