is readily demonstrated Google returns some 1.43 million results for the phrase rural living which variously relate in some manner or another to the concept of rural living and among which the Complainant is not to be found Likewise the

the Respondent is located A Google search for great courses lists almost exclusively references to the Complainant The Complainant says that its trademark is not descriptive and the disputed domain name can only refer to the Complainant s

Dunlop Goodyear and Google search results regarding Complainant There is no evidence that Respondent s use of the disputed domain name is either bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use without

name a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword Accor shows that all of the first results relate to Complainant s hotels Respondents failure to do so is a contributory factor to its bad faith In these days and age

registration records a simple GOOGLE search of the address provided does not appear to provide a true address In fact the Center successfully couriered the Notification of these proceedings to the provided address and Respondent himself signed

more than 73000 results in a Google search relating to the health wellness and nutrition world and that it is thereby intrinsically attractive as a premium domain name The Respondent states that none of the links on the website corresponding to

Claire Elle En el buscador Google la denominación Moroccanoil hace referencia inequívoca a la Demandante La Demandante afirma que es titular de tres Marcas Comunitarias a las que se ha hecho referencia en los Antecedentes de Hecho y dadas

of another letter L In Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 the panel found that the mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing

has demonstrated with Google search results According to his website the Respondent pretends to be Shanghai Trading Co Rémy Martin 上海人头马贸� 有限公司 But the Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant the Complainant

with the Complainant A Google search on this wording displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant The Respondent has also registered the domain name tcnbk.com which is similar to that used by Town Country National

or without meaning in Greek A Google search for Metaxa returned 500000 results including on the first page Metaxa Hotel in Zakynthos Greece When conducted in Greek the search returns are almost all unrelated to the Complainant The Respondent

the hits of a search on the Google search engine immediately show the websites of Complainant the first of the said results corresponding to its Domain Name sonae.pt Complainant contends that there are no valid grounds for a legitimate interest

his site also has a higher Google PageRank Alexa Traffic Global Rank and Google Search position Respondent alleges that Complainant has no rights in the name because the brand apparently referring here to one of Complainant s trademark

of confusing similarity See Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Nat Arb Forum Aug 4 2004 The mere addition of a single letter to the complainant s mark does not remove the respondent s domain names from the realm of confusing similarity in relation

has submitted evidence that a Google search for XVIDEOS does not bring up the disputed domain name It also says that there is very little obvious similarity between the get up of the Respondent website and that of the Complainant website apart from

The Complainant reference to Google Trends may arguably show that xnxx.com has been searched to some degree on Google since 2004 but that it has only recently become a more common search term suggesting that in fact the xxnx.com domain name was

based on the algorithms of Google DomainSponsor upstream provider This may therefore have generated content other than set by the Respondent The test slice was cancelled on around May 11 2014 During the test slice it is possible that Google

while the extract of a recent Google search carried out by the Complainant submitted as annex to the Complaint on the search term truvo shows that all of the search results on the first page refer to the Complainant except for the one result that

the first results listed on Google when entering Chinese translation of the word Motovario probably also due to an association of the website with meta tags corresponding to various translations of the word Motovario to Chinese and considers this

on the figures provided by Google Trends which shows that the use of ifunny for any purposes whatsoever remained negligible until July 2011 which was three months after the Complainant launched its www.ifunny.mobi website and related application