had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the word AMEDEI the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant that t he contested domain name is not used for any bona fide offerings even if it is not connected to any

Paragraph 4 b iv see also Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

application available in Google Play and in the Apple App Store The Complainant has offices in various cities in the United States Tokyo Seoul London Dubai and Sao Paulo and is a publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange The

Name is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 23 2018 On December 27 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

the terms wwwnovartis in the Google search engine the returned results all point to the Complainant and its business activity The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the disputed domain name and would have

popular search engines like Google for the term �flirt4free � list its brand and services as the first hit Furthermore the high number of domain names 49 registered by the Respondents clearly targeting the Complainant �s brand combined with the

Complainant asserts a simple Google search for University of Phoenix would have returned numerous search results relating to Complainant and its rights in the mark UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX The disputed domain name website displays the Complainant

reasonable consumer searching Google for �generic Vesicare � would be confused by the website located at the disputed domain name Respondent asserts that a detailed disclaimer is provided on the website to any visitors highlighting the website is

describing the efforts of Google to develop autonomous vehicles from as early as 2009 and stating that Complainant succeeded to the interests of Google in this project and became a distinct entity named Waymo in 2016 Complaint Exhibit J is an

11 2019 On February 11 2019 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the donghofossilchinhhang.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent

respondent s use of it See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

Google LLC v dcyoutube / david stonehill Claim Number FA1902001828331 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J Snider of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is dcyoutube / david stonehill Respondent

Google LLC v JORGE ROMAN / TZION MEDIA SLU Claim Number FA1902001828195 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Aimee R Gibbs of Dickinson Wright PLLC Michigan USA Respondent is JORGE ROMAN / TZION MEDIA SLU Respondent

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

Google LLC v Brent Ritz Claim Number FA1901001824418 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Craig A Beaker of Perkins Coie District of Columbia USA Respondent is Brent Ritz Respondent California USA REGISTRAR AND

under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

and plieger family name in Google returns more than 129000 and 33000 results respectively The Respondent also states that PLIEGER is used by other companies in their business and domain names and provides some examples of such use The Respondent

is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 21 2018 On December 21 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

it unnecessary to consider Google searches the Complainant made on the disputed domain name which in any event would require IT precautions to be taken first that are not reported in the Complaint Lastly the Panel notes that the Complainant sent