describes as a fraudulent Google search A third redirect site prompts the use to submit personal information to what the Complainant describes as a fraudulent survey According to the Complainant a fourth redirect site prompts the visitor to

Respondent also notes that a Google search for power agent shows 493 million results of which only handful are related to the Complainant Therefore the Respondent concludes that the Complainant has no monopoly over this common descriptive term

D2010-0899 A quick search on Google for ARCELOR would have revealed to the Respondent that all the results retrieved are strictly related to the Complainant and its trademark As for the use of the Domain Name based on the evidence submitted the

had carried out even a basic Google search in respect of the wording INTESA SAN PAOLO the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submited an extract of a Google search in support of its allegation This raises

the term roundshield and a Google search yields no evidence that roundshield is a term associated with the meaning Respondent suggests Fourth Respondent has no explanation why he also registered several domain names containing the LES BORDES

is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 21 2018 On November 22 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

submits information from Google Street View and Linkedin which suggests that the Respondent may be a Quality UP engineer The disputed domain name was registered on July 4 2018 The disputed domain name resolved to a webpage where the Internet

a ping-tree model similar to Google AdWords where the highest available bidder is connected to the consumer Regardless BarclaysusLoansOffer.com s service is always free to you Respondent is thus using the Domain Name to sponsor a web site which

Google LLC v Trinh Xuan Nghia Claim Number FA1812001822338 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Fabricio Vayra of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA Respondent is Trinh Xuan Nghia Respondent Vietnam REGISTRAR

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn and Google For instance currently the Complainant s official Facebook page has around 60.1 million followers on Twitter Previous UDRP panels have recognized the strength and renown of the Complainant s INSTAGRAM and INSTA

Paragraph4 a i see also Google Inc v DktBot.org FA 286993 Forum Aug 4 2004 finding that the complainant had established rights in the GOOGLE mark through its holding of numerous trademark registrations around the world iv See Altec Industries

REDTUBE and that a search on Google by Respondent would have listed Complainant s brands and services among the top results of such a search Consequently given the goodwill and reputation of Complainant s marks and Respondent s use of the disputed

search or a simple search via Google or any other search engine for Carrefour would have revealed to the Respondent the existence of the Complainant and the Trade Mark and the Respondent s failure to do so is a contributory factor to its bad faith

search or a simple search via Google or any other search engine for Carrefour would have revealed to the Respondent the existence of the Complainant and the Trade Mark and the Respondent s failure to do so is a contributory factor to its bad faith

has won a smartphone as a Google customer reward and prompt the visitor to provide his contact details and credit card information in order to claim the reward at the price of one Euro Accordingly the Disputed Domain Name appears to currently

advertising vendors such as Google or Yahoo who manage the advertiser end of this particular advertising mechanism and who ultimately produce the paid search results to which PPC searches lead PPC systems likewise can produce results which are

Name is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 10 2018 On December 10 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

4 b iii and/or iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 12 2018 On December 13 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a