4 b iii and/or iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA 1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

Network Solutions LLC and Google LLC respectively and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names Network Solutions LLC and Google LLC have verified that Respondent is bound by the Network Solutions LLC and Google LLC registration

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

appears from the results of a Google search conducted on the keyword boursorama BOUSORAMA has no meaning in any language The Complainant further contends that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name The

the mark SANATORIUMS.COM via Google AdWords from July 2014 to September 2018 costs in the amount of 549 952.97 EUR territory of Russia and 91 762.46 EUR for banners focused on Russia The Complainant spent in the same period costs in the amount of

under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

on Facebook Twitter and Google The Complainant handles the intellectual property portfolio for the JLL group The Complainant holds several registered trademarks including the following MARK JURISDICTION REGISTRATION NUMBER REGISTRATION DATE

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant s trademark suggests Respondent s bad faith see also Orphan Medical

and Complainant mark See e.g Google Inc v Texas International Property Associates FA 1212995 Forum Aug 25 2008 finding youtubes.com confusingly similar to YOUTUBE Accordingly the Panel considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar

PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP District of Columbia USA Respondent is Chen Weilong Respondent China REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED DOMAIN NAMES The domain names at issue are

as Facebook Youtube Instagram Google and Twitter The Disputed Domain Name klarnabank.nu is confusingly similar to the Complainant ™s registered rights as the Disputed Domain Name directly incorporates the Complainant ™s registered trademark KLARNA

as Facebook YouTube Instagram Google and Twitter The Complainant is the owner of the following trade mark registrations for KLARNA Jurisdiction Mark Registration Number Registration Date International KLARNA 1217315 March 4 2014 International

animalhealth bayer us www google S A d o Flowers e g d b a AT

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

than 10 000 000 users from Google s Android Play Store Menus of local restaurants can be accessed from its online ordering menu and orders placed by its customers are fulfilled by a fleet of delivery personnel The Complainant states that it is

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant s trademark suggests Respondent s bad faith The Panel recalls that

such as App Store IOS Google Play Store Android and blackberry App World It is said that the Complainant s mark NEDBANK has acquired a substantial reputation in South Africa as envisaged by Article 6b of the Paris Convention for the

g4s and g-4-s using the Google search engine but did not find any indication that these are commonly used acronyms for any goods or services and d The disputed domain name resolved to an active website showing graphic adult content Previous

Google LLC v Thierry georges anthoine Aillaud / nicolas bastos / marianne waszak / mickael lenglais / jean pierre beurton / edouard pierre Claim Number FA1808001801351 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Matthew J