nor its appearance in Google search results leads to the impression that a commercial link exists between Respondent and Complainant Finally Respondent asserts that the Domain Name is used to obtain commercial benefit and that Respondent is

as Facebook Youtube Instagram Google and Twitter Annex 4 to the Complaint Complainant has registered a number of trademarks for KLARNA including trademark registrations in China since June 7 2015 the Chinese trademark registration number 14203831

name A quick online search in Google or another search engine would have revealed the existence of the Complainant and its prior rights over the GULA GULA mark The Respondent registered the disputed domain name through a privacy shield service to

of fact a quick search on Google for INSTAGRAM would have revealed to the Respondent that all the results retrieved are strictly related to the Complainant and its trademark On the contrary it is rather clear that the Respondent was aware of

4 b iii and/or iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA 1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

Paragraph 4 b iii see also Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

Complainant has rights in the GOOGLE mark through its trademark registrations with the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO e.g Reg No 2884502 registered Sep 14 2002 Respondent s googlemybusiness.co Domain Name is confusingly similar to

see these domain first in google I will prepare the website soon The Respondent has not submitted any evidence indicating that it is the owner of any trademark rights or that it is commonly known by the disputed domain name Furthermore there is

A Complainant 1 Respondent s googlempresas.com googleamarillas.com and amarillasgoogle.com domain names are confusingly similar to Complainant s GOOGLE mark 2 Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in the googlempresas.com

Google LLC v PRIVATE PRIVATE / Bas Brouwer Claim Number FA1810001811856 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is PRIVATE PRIVATE / Bas Brouwer Respondent

which it currently uses for Google search purposes 3 Respondent registered and used the hims.com domain name in bad faith by renewing it after Respondent knew about Complainant s rights and by using it to compete with Complainant B Respondent 1

Domeinnaam door middel van de Google zoekmachine wordt geen enkel resultaat weergegeven dat verband houdt met Verweerder of de Domeinnaam aldus Eiser maar wel de mededeling �bedoelde je 123inkt.nl � en daaronder de advertenties van Eiser met links

Complainant contends that a Google search on the Domain Name does not show any results that refer to the Respondent but instead provides the suggestion �did you mean 123inkt.nl � displaying the sponsored link to the website under the Complainant

Domeinnaam door middel van de Google zoekmachine wordt geen enkel resultaat weergegeven dat verband houdt met Verweerder of de Domeinnaam aldus Eiser maar wel de mededeling �bedoelde je 123inkt.nl � en daaronder de advertenties van Eiser met links

Complainant contends that a Google search on the Domain Names does not show any results that refer to the Respondent but instead provides the suggestion �did you mean 123inkt.nl � displaying the sponsored link to the website under the Complainant

Complainant contends that a Google search on the Domain Names does not show any results that refer to the Respondent but instead provides the suggestion �did you mean 123inkt.nl � displaying the sponsored link to the website under the Complainant

in search mechanisms such as Google so as to unlawfully divert Internet users searching for the Complainant to the disputed domain name which was ranked and would appear at the top of Internet search result pages annex 42 B Respondent The

website as detected by Google �s Safe Browsing as shown by the evidence on record 5 Parties � Contentions A Complainant Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is identical to its trademark as the CREDIT MUTUEL trademark is

website as detected by Google �s Safe Browsing as shown by the evidence on record whereas the disputed domain name creditmutuel.shop is inactive 5 Parties � Contentions A Complainant Complainant submits that the disputed domain names are

from the App Store and Google Play The disputed domain name disregarding the generic Top-Level Domain gTLD app is identical to the Complainant s trademark The Complainant says the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect