had carried only a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would had led the Respondent to all obvious references to the Complainant This is a clear evidence of registration of the disputed domain

4 b iii and/or iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA 1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

of Policy Paragraph 4 c iii Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

at least from a search using Google that SAUDIA is used exclusively to refer to the Saudi Arabia state airline Finally the Respondent points to a number of registrations of related �mallof � domain names prior to March 2012 These comprise first

is registered with Google Inc the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on August 16 2018 On August 16 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar

Policy Paragraph 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

Google LLC v Tez App Claim Number FA1809001806449 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Melissa Alcantara of Dickinson Wright PLLC District of Columbia USA Respondent is Tez App Respondent India REGISTRAR AND DISPUTED

under the Policy see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant s mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of Complainant

name a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword �promod � demonstrates that all first results relate to the Complainant �s products or news 2 Use in bad faith The Respondent is using the Disputed Domain Name to

�s competitive purchase of Google AdWords using �skyscanner � as a search term There is one apparent instance of that in 2018 AdWords competitor targeting is not necessarily prohibited under Google �s �Advertising Policy � and Google �s

that has been flagged by Google as a d eceptive site because it falsely appears to be a website for the Complainant which includes a login page to collect usernames and passwords from the Complainant s customers as part of an apparent phishing

smart speakers under its GOOGLE and GOOGLE HOME marks Complainant has rights in its GOOGLE mark through registration with the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO Further Complainant has rights in its GOOGLE HOME mark through

Internet traffic Indeed a Google search on the expression FRENCH OPEN displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant Furthermore the disputed domain name displays websites with information related to an unauthorized live

the term �whatsapp � in Google �s search engine refer to Complainant Complainant �s WHATSAPP trademark has acquired considerable reputation and goodwill worldwide including in Spain where Respondents are based Complainant has secured

began �investing � in Google AdWords in 2016 Since then for an expenditure of EUR 39000 it has gained some 26 million impressions resulting in 137568 clicks through to its site the number of �clicks � increasing each year The figures from

in French All the results on Google of this term are related to the Complainant The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and it is not related in any way with the

e-mail service provided by Google and not an e-mail referred to the Complainant or to one of the Complainant's subsidiaries such as @arcerlormittal.com and considering that the Respondent failed to file a response in these UDRP proceedings the

Internet traffic Indeed a Google search on the expression FRENCH OPEN® displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant Furthermore the Disputed Domain Name display websites with information related to an unauthorized live

argues that a �search via Google or Bing for piombo � does not return piombo.com anywhere within the first 400 results on Google or 20 pages of results on Bing � The Respondent asserts that he since �the registration in 1999 and continuing to

registration and use See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an