GoDaddy com www luksloft D google ph

of Policy Paragraph 4 c iii Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

16 2018 On August 15 2018 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the robertlnalf.com domain name registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

Paragraph 4 a i analysis See Google Inc v N/A k gautam FA 1524232 Forum Nov 18 2013 finding that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the at-issue mark despite the misspelling of the mark the addition of a generic term and the

10 2018 On August 14 2018 Google LLC confirmed by email to the Forum that the metsoo.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

Paragraph 4 c i or iii See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

of Policy Paragraph 4 c iii Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

Policy Paragraph 4 b iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum April 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

one of the first hits on the Google search engine when entering the term hja The disputed domain name was registered on December 13 2017 and is currently inactive 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant a Identical or Confusingly Similar The

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair

in Dutch and in English using Google Translate with an attachment containing the Response that could be downloaded through a file link The Center has informed the Respondent on August 7 2018 that it does not accept such submissions through a link

Name is registered with Google Inc the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on July 25 2018 On July 25 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request

use the Mark The results of a Google search conducted by the Complainant shows that the Respondent Stefan Nagies is the CEO of a company called CTLeading based in Thailand which appears to have been involved in bitcoin mining since 2015 is the

Even a simple search on Google would have clearly indicated the rights of the Complainant Finally the Complainant argues that since MX-records are set up for the Disputed Domain Name there is a high risk that the Disputed Domain Name is or

Paragraph 4 b iii and iv Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus Claim Number FA1808001799694 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Chantal Z Hwang of Cooley LLP California USA Respondent is Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus Respondent

compete with Complainant See Google Inc v wwwgoogle.com and Jimmy Saivesh Behain WIPO D2000-1240 finding bad faith in respondent s use of the dispute domain name to direct Internet users to respondent s competing website Fatbrain.com Inc v IQ

lastly presented a Google search result to show it holds a domain name that includes its protected name This elicited a paid search result that provides details of the Complainant also contained in other evidence submitted As to the

Indeed the Panel notes that a Google search submitted by Complainant which is not contested by Respondent shows that most of the references to goodr in the first three pages of the Google search results specifically refer to Complainant and its