INVESTMENTS® Moreover a Google search for the term PIONEER INVESTMENTS results in the multiple search results linked to the Complainant Given the reputation and fame of the Complainant as well as the prior registration of an almost identical

en el motor de búsqueda Google nada indica que el Titular sea conocido corrientemente por el nombre de dominio en disputa ni que tenga relación alguna con la marca BMW o con la planta del Promovente que se construye en San Luis Potosí v Al

Paragraph 4 b iii and iv Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

claims that he needed to use Google Translate to translate the website connected to the Disputed Domain Names to English and in his communication to the Complainant and to the Center 6 Discussion and Findings 6.1 Language of the Proceedings As the

further sets out that a Google research for virgin start up loans leads to results that are referring to the Complainant group of companies only and therefore the public would associate the domain with the Complainant 2 The Respondent has no

name a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword dassault demonstrates that all first results relate to the Complainant s field of activities or news Given the current pervasiveness of the Internet and advancement

a new domain which features Google Advertisements See Compl Ex M FINDINGS The disputed domain name clubpenguinonline.com was created on January 3 2018 Complainant owns several trademarks containing the words Club Penguin The dates of registration

but please understand that Google can take legal action if there is reference to Google been affiliated � Que traducido por Google Translator es �Está bien que use este dominio pero tenga en cuenta que Google puede emprender acciones legales si

is registered with Google Inc the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on June 27 2018 On June 27 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

is not a legitimate use See Google Inc v Petrovich FA1008001339345 Nat Arb Forum Sept 23 2010 Respondent s failure to make an active use of the disputed domain names except for the purpose of downloading malicious computer software is not a use

its website by using Google pay-per-click advertising and that it does not have control over the content of those adverts It denies having obtained click-through revenues 6 Discussion and Findings In order to succeed in the Complaint the

or fair use see also Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

of Policy Paragraph 4 a iii Google v Freije FA 111000102609 Forum January 11 2002 referring to the respondent s use of the domain name in connection with a pornographic and sexually explicit web site the panel held that Respondent s registration

disputed domain name website Google search result for a query AMUNDI PIONEER RESPONDENT The Respondent has not provided any response to the Complaint Rights The Complainant has to the satisfaction of the Panel shown the disputed domain name is

Even a simple search on Google would have clearly indicated the rights of the Complainant Finally the Complainant argues that there is a high risk that the Disputed Domain Name is or will be used in email correspondence According to the

Paragraph 4 c i or iii See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

13 A simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword �Sofitel � will show that all first results relate to the Complainant �s activities or news 14 The Respondent has failed to provide an explanation for incorporating

search engines like Yahoo and Google would have shown that MOBILCOM is a trademark The Panel thus concludes that Respondent has registered this Domain Name to prevent Complainant from reflecting its mark in the corresponding com Domain Name

Complainant declares that a Google search for the term SPIOLTO in the geographical zone of the Respondent results in multiple search results linked to the Complainant The Complainant takes the view that given the reputation and fame of the

is registered with Google Inc the �Registrar � 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the �Center � on June 11 2018 On June 11 2018 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a