rights in that mark See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world The Panel

rights in that mark See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world The Panel

had carried only a basic Google search in respect of the wordings SHOWROOMPRIVE.COM and SHOWROOMPRIVE the same would had led the Respondent to all obvious references to the Complainant This is a clear evidence of registration of the disputed

rights in that mark See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sep 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world The Panel

4 b iii and/or iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

INSTA and WHATSAPP into Google s search engine exclusively refer to Complainants Complainants note the following regarding each of the Domain Names 1 instagramsepeti.com English translation Instagram cart Currently resolves to a website in

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn and Google In addition to its strong online presence Complainant claims that it has secured ownership of numerous trademark registrations in the term Instagram in many jurisdictions around the world It points out that the

the Policy citing inter alia Google Inc v David Miller FA 1067791 Forum Oct 24 2007 finding bad faith where respondent s domain youtubex.com violated complainant s terms of service and was meant to attract for commercial gain confused Internet

Respondent have performed a Google or similar search on the Internet before registering the disputed domain name it would have easily learnt about the Complainant s trademark registered and used worldwide in particular in the United States

s actions vii See for example Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

this mark adding that when a Google search is conducted using NETBANK the Google search engine provides the results for www.netbank.nedsecure.co.za one of the Complainant s websites The Complainant provides corresponding screenshot evidence of

4 b iii and/or iv See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA 1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent s inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

the disputed domain name with Google which should be proof of its legitimate rights The Panel disagrees with the arguments of the Respondent as having nothing substantial to do with any alleged legitimate interests of his In fact business name and

and United Kingdom in the Google search engine the returned results point to the Complainant and its business activity The same result is given in the USA the addressed geographic part of the disputed domain name eg US Trademark NOVARTIS No

18 2019 On January 22 2019 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the frledkin.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

16 2019 On January 16 2019 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the trueevalue.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

de una consulta efectuada en Google sobre la denominación �Skechers � y que se refieren todos ellos a la Demandante Anexo no 2 a la Demanda La Demandante afirma disponer de Derechos Previos sobre el término que forma parte del Nombre de Dominio

domain name is visited in the Google Chrome browser a warning page comes up warning that phishing activity has been detected at the site The Complainant also provides evidence that on November 14 2018 an email was sent to a third party using the

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Pritam Singh / Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum Mar 17 2016 agreeing that respondent has not shown any bona fide offering of goods or services or any legitimate noncommercial or fair use

resultados em pesquisas no Google que busquem pela expressão �bing � e que seus acessos se devem ao próprio trabalho de divulgação do Reclamado Nega por fim que o nome de domínio em disputa tenha sido registrado ou utilizado em má-fé C