download content see also Google Inc v Alex Dori FA 1623672 Forum July 13 2015 Given that Respondent is using the disputed domain name to offer illegal content for download and streaming the Panel finds that Respondent's use of the disputed

use under Policy � 4 b iv See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that disputed domain names which distribute malware to Internet users computers demonstrate Respondent's bad faith under Policy � 4 b iv see also Hess Corp v

the keyword autry into the Google search engine no results relate to the Respondent It says also that based on its research of publicly available databases the Respondent has no registered trade mark rights for Autry The Complainant has also

4 2022 � On March 7 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the bunge-sas.net and bunge-sas.org domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names Google LLC has verified that

registration and/or use See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a �phishing scheme further established its bad

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 4 2022 On February 7 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

می باش According to Google Translate in English this is Abara Pump Industries Company was established in 1994 in Iran and started its activity in practice The purpose of establishing this company in Iran in general to provide services and

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world �

confusingly similar to EBAY Google LLC v COD FA 1849350 Forum July 28 2019 finding gmail-login.com confusingly similar to GMAIL The Panel considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to a mark in which Complainant has rights �

the first page hits from a Google search on rady children s are associated with the Complainant The Complainant is the registrant of the domain names mychartatradychildrens.com and mychartatradychildrens.org and operate a patient portal website

for ZINO DAVIDOFF in the Google and Baidu the leading search engine in China the returned results all pointed to the Complainant and its business activities The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the

una búsqueda en el motor Google del nombre del Titular junto al nombre de dominio en disputa no arroja ningún resultado que los vincule Que no consta que el nombre de dominio en disputa coincida en parte o en su totalidad con un derecho de

has demonstrated that a mere Google search on fxdd fxdd trading or fxddtrading evidently reveals its rights In these circumstances it is not reasonably conceivable that the Respondent may not have been aware of the Complainant s rights when she

even carried out a basic Google search on the Complainant s marks the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant It is more than likely that the disputed domain name would not have been registered if it were not for

9 2022 � On March 9 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the victoriassecretmetaverse.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

same nonexistent according to Google Maps street address 4 all five Domain Names were registered with the same registrar using a privacy service 5 all five Domain Names were registered within a two-week period and 6 all five Domain Names have the

of an art gallery and iv a Google maps screenshot These elements in conjunction with the circumstances of the case are not sufficient and cannot be used to demonstrate her legitimate interest to use the disputed domain name Therefore according

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 21 2022 On January 21 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 10 2022 On February 11 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

specific to the Complainant Google searches for it as well as for service mutuel crédit reveal results that almost exclusively relate to the Complainant b The Respondent is ostensibly involved in the same industry as the Complainant and the

name are configured to use Google as an email service provider Complainant alleges that this suggests an intent to use the domain name to pass off as Complainant and thereby conduct fraudulent activity victimizing Complainant's current or

all the results of a simple Google search are related to the Complainant and its products Therefore it is inconceivable that the Respondent could have registered the disputed domain name without actual knowledge of Complainant's rights in the

Disputed Domain Name A simple Google search of the terms harcourt photography shows only results relating to the Complainant Given the well-known character of the HARCOURT trademark the Respondent could not have ignored the Complainant s trademark

2 2022 � On March 2 2022 Google LLC NameCheap Inc confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the wwe.dev wweinf.net and wrestlemania.info domain names are registered with Google LLC NameCheap Inc and that Respondent is the current registrant of the

under Policy � 4 b iv � See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent's use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad

to Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

1 2022 Key-Systems GmbH and Google LLC respectively confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the ccover.co and � cloudcoversolutions.com domain names are respectively registered with Key-Systems GmbH and Google LLC and that Respondent is the current

all the results of a simple Google search are related or refers to the Complainant and its financial support JCDECAUX Therefore the Complainant contends that it is inconceivable that the Respondent could have registered the disputed domain name

also refers to violation of Google s Webmaster Guidelines e.g cloaking the practice of presenting different content or URLs to human users and search engines black hat advertising and advertising in jurisdictions where gambling is regulated thus

c iii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 finding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS record

estão na base da memória do Google A Reclamada declarou na sua defesa não ter interesse em exploração da marca apenas informar aos clientes que trabalha com o conserto de seus notebooks da marca Dell fora de garantia E afirmou ainda que

estão na base da memória do Google A Reclamada declarou na sua defesa não ter interesse em exploração da marca apenas informar aos clientes que trabalha com o conserto de seus notebooks da marca Dell fora de garantia E afirmou ainda que

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 2 2022 On February 2 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 29 2021 On December 29 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

listing they are taken to a Google Forms page where their personal information is collected Applicants are then contacted by someone impersonating one of Complainant's employees to set up an interview presumably to move on to the next stage of

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 25 2022 On January 26 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed in English with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 13 2022 On January 13 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the

all of the results of a Google search of the terms FLOWBIRD refers to the Complainant and it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark Furthermore the disputed

with Complainant � See also Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a �phishing scheme further established its bad

has also submitted Google search results showing that a Google search for frontline plus results in hits concerning only the Complainant s products While both words FRONTLINE and PLUS are dictionary words the combination of these two

over 500 million times in Google Play and is ranked number 1 among entertainment applications in the Apple Store The Complainant owns multiple trademark registrations in multiple jurisdictions including United States trademark registration

under Policy � 4 b iv � See Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

name Registrar which includes Google ads generated by Google and links to animal hip injuries It is not shown that Respondent had any knowledge of the links generated by Google or that the ads existed more than 15 years ago when the disputed domain

the addition of au a simple Google search would have revealed the Complainant s existence at the time There is no obvious reason nor has the Respondent offered an explanation for the Respondent to register a domain name wholly incorporating the

www.mooseknucklescanada.com Google and Bing searches for the term moose knuckles result in hits that refer to the Complainant and its products rather than in the context of any generic or descriptive use The Respondent appears to be an individual

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Respondent has registered or acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO INTESA and BANCA INTESA SANPAOLO the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant Therefore it is more than likely that the domain name at issue

name For example by searching Google for voi.se or voi there is no information nor even indication of the terms related to the Domain Holder but instead the results show information related to the Petitioner This fact asserts even further the

to Policy � 4 a iii See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

24 2022 � On February 24 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the universityrichmond.net domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent

16 2022 � On February 16 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the carahs0fts.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

the Apple app Store and the Google Play stores confirm these activity levels Complainant s official www.instagram.com website is currently ranked as the twenty-first most visited website in the world according to the information company Alexa and

United States trademark and Google searches for the word reimex The Respondent is unable to reproduce the results of these searches of November 2018 and provided a Google search conducted on January 13 2022 as Exhibit A to his Response which

a dictionary word and that a Google search produces results that predominantly refer to the Complainant Thus the Complainant argues that it is reasonable to conclude that the Respondent registered the Domain Name with full knowledge of the

WIPO Case No D2012-0027 Google Inc v ShaheenYounas WIPO Case No D2012-1365 The American Automobile Association Inc v Cameron Jackson / PrivacyDotLink Customer 2440314 WIPO Case No D2016-1671 Third the Panel finds similarly to other UDRP

search or a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword sandoz would have revealed to the Respondent the existence and use of the Trade Mark The Respondent s failure to do so is a contributory factor to its bad faith In

Respondent has opted to run Google Ads on its website thus directly profiting from the traffic it attracts As is the nature of Google Ads Complainant s competitors too can advertise and indeed have as seen from Annex 35 of the Complaint Here such

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 29 2022 On January 31 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed in English with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 22 2021 On December 22 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the

All the results of a Google search of the term BIODERMA are related to the Complainant and its products Furthermore Previous Panels confirmed that the combination of BIO and DERMA is distinctive to the Complainant and its trademark

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

its trademark It states that Google searches of 3SHAPE show that the Complainant s website and social media appear as the top results The Complainant therefore asserts that it is inconceivable that the Respondent was unaware of it and its 3SHAPE

at issue google status.com Yu Hsien non use good faith D2000 0641 well known D2014 1040 0003 USA � my-statefarm-app com name postmaster@my-statefarm-app Rules 3 0 4 rockwellautomation co antfinancial-investorrelations mark

by typing FB into the Google search engine referring to the Complainant Given this the Respondent could not credibly argue that it did not have prior knowledge of the Complainant s trademark at the time of registration of the disputed

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA and INTESA SANPAOLO the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submitted an extract of a Google search in support of its allegation

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION � Google LLC v Haim cohen haimcohen Claim Number FA2202001985436 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.� Respondent is Haim cohen

8 2022 � On February 9 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the premierhealthcares.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

as shown by its dominance of Google search results for LA HALLE as well as by the Complainant s extensive media coverage and its many social media followers The Respondent could easily have discovered the Complainant s mark was a famous brand and

would have shown up in any Google search It says that while the disputed domain name was only registered in November 2020 that it has been using its trade mark in the United States for 30 years and that its trade mark registrations pre-date the

and Rewards Services BRS A Google search for the terms sudexo brs exclusively gives results related to SODEXO This clearly shows the confusion between the signs Due to the almost identical reproduction of the Trademark in the Disputed Domain

to Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 3 2021 On December 6 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

for shopnovartis in the Google search engine the returned results point to the Complainant and its business activities According to the Complainant the Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the disputed

Respondent had carried out a Google search for the name SERVIER the search results would have yielded immediate and obvious references to the Complainant It is therefore reasonable to infer that the Respondent either knew or should have known that

the disputed domain name See Google Inc v S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as �Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on February 1 2022 On February 1 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

would have shown up in any Google search It says that while the disputed domain name was only registered in July 2021 that it has been using its trade mark in the United States for 30 years and that its trade mark registrations pre-date the

it is currently blocked by Google Safe Browsing because of suspected phishing activity   NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED Rights The Complainant has to the satisfaction of the Panel shown that the disputed domain name is

of these when accessed via Google Chrome is a warning page that alerts users that the connection is not private and that attackers may be trying to steal your information from the Domain Name for example passwords messages or credit cards � When

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

on search engines like Google but it obviously searched Google for the save from combination because it found that that string with the com gTLD was already taken.� Further for some reason Respondent did not include the word internet in the

ii de una simple búsqueda en Google habría obtenido resultados de las actividades de la Demandante y sus filiales siendo la mera inacción del Demandante un factor que contribuye a su mala fe iii utiliza el Nombre de Dominio para redirigir a una

Twitter Pinterest Tumblr and Google None of these logos are linked to an actual social media page Instead each logo simply allows the potential consumer to share a link to the site on their social media account Except for the skecherau.com site

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by the Google LLC registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain disputes brought

registration and/or use See Google Inc v Jon G FA 106084 Forum Apr 26 2002 Respondent's unsupported statement that a potentially legitimate genealogy website will be coming soon will not suffice to demonstrate rights or interests under Policy � 4

est enregistré auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte en anglais a été déposée par Natixis auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l Organisation Mondiale de la

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 28 2022 On January 31 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

Names a simple search via Google or any other search engine using the keyword BNP PARIBAS demonstrates that all first results relate to Complainant s products and services In this day and age of the Internet and advancement in information

around the world and all the Google results of the search of the terms FR BOUYGUES BATIMENT refer to the Complainant s entity BOUYGUES CONSTRUCTION i.e the parent company of BOUYGUES BATIMENT Furthermore the disputed domain name resolves to a

16 2022 � On February 16 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the assurancewirelessonline.com and assurancewirelessebb.com domain names are registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the names.�

de dominio en disputa es Google LLC 3 Iter Procedimental La Demanda se presentó ante el Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI el Centro el 1 de enero de 2022 El 4 de enero de 2022 el Centro envió a Google LLC por correo electrónico

registration and use See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 holding that the respondent's use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION � Google LLC v Cl�mentine Minot Claim Number FA2202001982946 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.� Respondent is Cl�mentine Minot

A simple search in the Google search engine for the term bitpanda shows only search results related to the Complainant This would easily allow the Respondent as holder of the disputed domain name to profit from traffic produced by users