for Buynovartis in the Google search engine most of the search results point to the Complainant and its business activities The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the disputed domain name and would

Complainant's website.� See Google LLC v Abbas Khan FA2108001959001 Forum Sept 9 2021 use of domain name to divert users away from complainant's website to respondent's website constitutes neither a bona fide offering of goods or services under

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

est enregistré auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte a été déposée par Boursorama S.A auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l Organisation Mondiale de la

est enregistré auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte a été déposée par Carrefour SA auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l Organisation Mondiale de la

search engines such as Google.com there are no relevant returned results that would indicate that the Respondent is known by the Disputed Domain Name When searching for the terms lurpak.top or lurpak and top the vast majority of the results

name was entered into a Google Chrome browser the Internet user was forwarded to different websites seemingly at random Complainant provides examples of the destination websites which include a parking page and the websites of well-known

under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world � In the

c ii �See�Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742� Forum�Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as �Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in the WHOIS

domain name appearing in Google searches In his emails the Respondent said that his website had been present on the Internet for many years and that his website and the WhatsApp website are far and wide mismatched The Respondent notes that he

2021 elle a demandé à Google de déréférencer le site litigieux ce que Google a immédiatement fait Le 7 septembre 2021 la Requérante a constaté la réapparition du même site litigieux cette fois sous l adresse dinh-van.com Ledit nom

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

is known globally 2 A simple Google search shows the Complainant s trademark ALI EXPRESS and the platform operating under that trademark 3 The disputed domain name was registered some years after the registration and use of the trademark

on popular engine such as Google evidences that the Trademark AIRTEL and AIRTEL 121 are associated with the Complainant and no one else The well-known nature of the Complainant s Trademark AIRTEL has prior statutory registrations and also the

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant This Panel coincides with Complainant s argument and finds its emphasis at point

term Myka on the Internet via Google or any other search engine would have revealed to the Respondent the existence of the Complainant and the Complainant s rights The Respondent s failure to do so is a contributory factor to its bad faith The

maintains that a simple Google search would have informed Respondent of the existence of Complainant and its services Complainant also argues that because Respondent is not making any bona fide offering of goods and services with the disputed

translation per the Complaint Google translate michelin tires-michelin and tires-michelin respectively The Domain Names incorporate an Arabic translation of the MICHELIN trademark of Complainant in its entirety and the use of Punycode to create a

the Respondent through a Google search apart from its location in Switzerland is that it is in the business of IT Engineering and Consulting Against this background an inference is available that the Respondent adopted the disputed domain name

Policy � 4 a iii see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

name's resolving website See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on January 14 2022 On January 14 2022 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

and identified as such in Google translate 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant The Complainant is a well-known electric board sports company that sells a very successful line of electric skateboards under the mark ONEWHEEL including in retail

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 3 2021 On December 6 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

domain names see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

24 2022 � On January 25 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the carahsofft.org Domain Name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

est enregistré auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte a été déposée en anglais par Natixis et Pramex International auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l

domain name indexed in Google which it would be if the landing page was intended to attract traffic and benefit from association with the Complainant In addition to references to the Complainant Google searches for the term reassure include

it mean in my language so google translated it to التركيب ألعاب which literally means puzzle games or installation games So from that moment I was certain that Lego word is a word used to describe the activity of building and

the Apple App Store and the Google Play store The Complaint includes evidence that the Complainant is the owner of registered trademarks for MY WELLNESS European Union Trademark Registration No 001557636 MY WELLNESS registered on March 30 2001

a mark under the Policy See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

the Panel finds that the case Google Inc v Q Interactive Pty Ltd / Mr Victor Quinteros WIPO Case No DAU2012-0026 is instructive on this point There the respondent claimed to be using Google s ANDROID mark descriptively in the domain name

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 13 2021 On December 14 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

the Complainant s app in the Google Play store 5 Parties Contentions A Complainant The Complainant contends that the Domain Name is identical to its PRINCIPAL trademark the Mark that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect

however conducted its own Google search against the name BETRIVERS limited to dates prior to October 3 2019 it appears to the Panel that the Complainant offered betting services online at www.betrivers.com 1 from June or July 2019 and it is

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION � Google LLC v Shengyuan Qiu Claim Number FA2201001980957 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.� Respondent is Shengyuan Qiu

So far as searches of Google and Apple Maps disclose there is no town or city named Kiev in Turkey Kiev Turkey is however a gourmet meal or dish 5 Discussion and Findings No response has been filed The Complaint and Written Notice have been

for the term Bimbosan on Google leads to a list of results showing a connection with the Complainant Second the Complainant submits that it has not authorized licensed or permitted the Respondent to register or use the Disputed Domain Name or

When searching Chagall in Google all of the results refer to the painter and consequently to the Complainant s trade marks The disputed domain name is identical to the Complainant s trade mark The Respondent has no rights or legitimate

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

a portal with links through Google to indicate possible related searches Finally the Respondent s representative states that its client has owned the Domain Name for many years and since it was not ready to use it had parked it with the Registrar

Complainant conducted a Google search for the named Respondent and the Domain Name.� Google reported no match found Complaint Annex 12 � It also conducted a search of the USPTO and Madrid Monitor of WIPO records for Respondent as the owner of

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 10 2021 On December 13 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

� 4 a iv and otherwise.� See Google Inc v Domain Admin FA 1502001605239 Forum Mar 22 2015 finding that use of a disputed domain name to aid illegal activities under Complainant's trademark suggests Respondent's bad faith see also Bittrex Inc v

known by a domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

Twitter Pinterest Tumblr y Google Fotos En la página de inicio de este sitio web se muestra un aviso resaltado de forma destacada encerrado en un recuadro de color rojo indicando lo siguiente AVISO La información contenida en este blog

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

14 2022 � On January 17 2022 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the gireyco.com Domain Name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound by

� 4 c iii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 finding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS record

PLAN20 directly through Google Play and Apple App Store links which are included in the website The Respondent explained in its website that it named this app PLAN20 because it provides a health management plan to help pets live up to the age

consisting of maaden A Google search result for the term maaden discloses results relating solely to the Complainant The Respondent is not making a legitimate or noncommercial fair use of the disputed domain name It is inconceivable that the

years Complainant also cites Google Analytics data indicating that the BRAZZERS.com website had approximately 820 000 to 1.39 million daily users in 2019 Complainant owns trademark registrations for BRAZZERS and related marks in the United States

Complainant's mark See e.g Google LLC v Privacy Protection FA 1970877 Forum Nov 30 2021 finding gooqleplay.com confusingly similar to GOOGLE PLAY Google LLC v John Harris / YT FA 1906135 Forum Aug 26 2020 finding gooqle.email confusingly similar

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

is performed on picassol on Google the response first shows try with the spelling picasso The first result refers to the Respondent s website but the second is the Wikipedia page for Pablo Picasso and all the associated searches refer to his life

regard Complainant provided a Google search of aoga showing Complainant s information in the top results Even if Complainant s search is dated 2022 the Panel notes Complainant s longstanding use of AOGA and noting Respondent s acquisition of the

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 29 2021 On November 30 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

all of the results of a Google search of the terms ARCELORMITTAL DE refers to the Complainant Given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademark and reputation and the fact exposed above it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

a ping-tree model similar to Google AdWords where the highest available bidder is connected to the consumer Therefore Respondent uses the RISE Mark to divert sales to third party lenders that directly compete with Complainant s product and

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

locally and underlines that a Google search does show that only the ski resort or events at the resort is associated with the name The Complainant states that the intensity of the trademark is the only cause for the Respondent to use the

a typo of the world famous Google mark googie was intended as a reference to a type of architecture This latter example and in particular the rather incredible apparent assertion that this domain name bore no relation to the Google mark

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on December 23 2021 in English On December 27 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the

to the Complainant a simple Google search using the keyword BIGMAT only shows links to the Complainant s website and its products or to the website of its members and sales outlets The trademark BIGMAT is used by the company called MATÉRIAUX

of a disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

el servicio de traducción de Google El Experto nota que a pesar de esta afirmación el Titular ha logrado comunicar al Centro sus inquietudes así como preparar y presentar la Contestación utilizando el formato proporcionado para tal efecto en el

were set to redirect to the Google home page The evidence submitted by the Complainant shows that the disputed domain names were previously used to point to a number of different websites including websites displaying pornographic images and

to Policy � 4 c iii see also Google LLC v Host Master / 1337 Services LLC FA 1935183 Forum Apr 5 2021 Finding the disputed domain name which encourages and enables users to violate Complainant's YouTube Terms of Service did not give rise to rights

domain names see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

to Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 25 2021 On November 25 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 23 2021 On November 23 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

谷歌有限责任公司 Google LLC v 石磊 Lei Shi WIPO Case No DCO2020-0030 The disputed domain name was registered on April 13 2021 It resolves to a landing page displaying Pay-Per-Click PPC links for among other things User Authentication

by a disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

indicator of bad faith See Google Inc v Bassano FA 232958 Forum Mar 8 2004 respondent's use of the googlesex.info domain name to intentionally attract Internet users to a website featuring adult-oriented content constituted bad faith

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

the second element See e.g Google LLC v Aлександр � митрович Бутенко WIPO Case No DUA2020-0009 Noting the facts and arguments set out above the Panel finds that the Complainant has made a prima facie case The Respondent

the second element See e.g Google LLC v Aлександр � митрович Бутенко WIPO Case No DUA2020-0009 Noting the facts and arguments set out above the Panel finds that the Complainant has made a prima facie case The Respondent

Additionally all top Google search results for the CANVA term pertain to the Complainant s offering Lastly canvavina has no meaning in both English and Vietnamese so that the decision to register the combination of the CANVA trademark and

common family name and that a Google search of Mikels with more than 46 000 000 results does not show the Complainant until page 3 Annex 3 to the Response which in view of the responding person indicates that contrary to what is claimed by the

practice of the Forum See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

selling fitness equipment a Google Play downloading page of a mobile application and a website that allows users to trade with crypto at currency.com the Crypto Website among others together the Websites The fact that the Domain Name redirects

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 17 2021 On November 18 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

transfer of cardinalhealth.co Google LLC v ZhangWei / S Jon Grant / Jerry FA 1896568 Forum July 21 2020 ordering transfer of googleclassroom.co and similar domain names The Panel finds that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 24 2021 On November 24 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

search engines such as Google show the Complainant s brand and services as the first result the Respondent registered the Domain Name to target the Complainant intentionally and no other reason for its registration is conceivable the

with its Response Recent Google search of the term custom writings Google search limited to results before 1 January 2005 of the term custom writings Rights The Complainant has to the satisfaction of the Panel shown the disputed domain name is

c ii � See�Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum�Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as �Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in the WHOIS

del motor de búsqueda Google sobre el término Carrefour location de los que resulta que todos ellos se refieren a la Demandante Por todo ello mantiene que el Demandado conocía o debía conocer que registrando y utilizando el nombre de

странице выдачи Google в Украине Никаких запретов на регистрацию спорных доменных имен ни Ответчику ни компании Cириус-93 от FISKARS FINLAND OY AB не

the term Instagram into the Google search engine available at www.google.com and www.google.com.sg refer to the Complainant The Complainant therefore submits that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name in the full knowledge of the

to identify the company A Google search produced by the Complainant demonstrates that all references to LRLCY are references to the Complainant s company The Complainant is the owner of Benelux Registered Trademark no 1450917 for the word mark

with the Complainant A Google search on the expression CREDIT AGRICOLE displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant and its banking activity Thus given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademarks and

Trademark All search Google results for the term bopursorama refer to the Complainant and the BOURSORAMA Trademark On or before November 25 2021 the Disputed Domain Name redirected to another website prominently featuring pornographic

form of screenshots of the Google search results for Mary Washington displaying results for the mother of George Washington the University of Washington and Complainant and for Mary Washington Healthcare displaying results for Complainant alone

searching for Sizhou in the Google search engine all the results shown therein refer to the acquisition made by the Complainant of the company Sizhou That several decisions issued under the Policy have considered that when a disputed domain name

5 2022 GoDaddy.com LLC Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the msfinancialservices.net and msfinancialservices.biz domain names are registered with GoDaddy.com LLC Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the

produced screenshots of a Google search for Bioderma and none of the hits on that search evidenced use of that name by any person or entity other than Complainant Complaint Annex 7 � On this evidence and in the absence of any evidence to the

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 3 2021 On November 3 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a