of a disputed domain name See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

n étaient pas listés sur Google donc le Défendeur utilise sa connaissance et son argent pour aider et rendre les informations accessibles dans le haut des résultats 6 Discussion et conclusions 6.1 Langue de la procédure Aux termes du

est enregistré auprès de Google LLC ci-après désigné l Unité d enregistrement 3 Rappel de la procédure Une plainte a été déposée par l Association des Centres Distributeurs E Leclerc A.C.D Lec auprès du Centre d arbitrage et de

the second element See e.g Google LLC v Aлександр � митрович Бутенко WIPO Case No DUA2020-0009 Taking into account the facts and arguments set out above the Panel finds that the Complainant has made a prima facie case The

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

to Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

the second element See e.g Google LLC v Aлександр � митрович Бутенко WIPO Case No DUA2020-0009 Noting the facts and arguments set out above the Panel finds that the Complainant has made a prima facie case The Respondent

to a domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

27 2021 � On December 28 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the cruisemargaritaville.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

and famous see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

around the world see also Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world �

but were auto-generated by Google or a parking provider software Therefore the Panel may find that Respondent uses the disputed domain name for a bona fide offering of goods or services pursuant to Policy � 4 c i � Respondent also argues that

Respondent states that in a Google search for approve me procurement Complainant does not show up on the first three pages of search results iii Registered and used in bad faith Respondent submits that as stated in the sworn declaration of Brian

en el motor de búsqueda Google y no se encontró ningún resultado que permita concluir que la Demandada tiene algún interés legítimo para usar el nombre de dominio en disputa Que cuando la Demandada registró el nombre de dominio en

� 4 c iii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 finding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS record

Policy � 4 a iii see also Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a �phishing scheme further established its bad

including the USPTO.� See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 25 2021 On November 25 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on October 20 2021 On October 20 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

sur le moteur de recherches Google avec les termes Spie Batignolles Energie renvoyant vers sa filiale Enfin le Requérant soutient que le Défendeur ne démontre aucune activité relative au nom de domaine litigieux et qu il est impossible de

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 22 2021 On November 23 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

the terms VIVENDISE in the Google search engine the returned results point to the Complainant and its business activities The Panel finds that the Complainant has established a prima facie case that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate

and famous see also Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

noncommercial or fair use See Google Inc v Prisma Singh/Pandaje Technical Services Pvt Ltd FA 1660771 Forum March 17 2016 � As such the Panelist finds that the Respondent does not have rights or a legitimate interest in the Domain Name and that the

website attempts to install a Google Chrome extension on the user's computer Complainant does not know what happens when the extension is installed � B Respondent Respondent failed to submit a Response in this proceeding � FINDINGS Complainant has

the domain name at issue Google LLC v Noboru Maruyama / Personal FA 2001001879162 Forum Mar 3 2020 the registration and use of domain name that is confusingly similar to a trademark with which the respondent has no connection has frequently

17 2021 � On December 17 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the robertlhalf.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is bound

had carried even a basic Google search in respect of the wording INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant submits an extract of a Google search in support of its allegation This raises a clear

confusingly similar to ORANGE Google Technology Inc v Internet Hispano S.L FA 176533 Forum Sept 16 2003 finding googleporno.com confusingly similar to GOOGLE The Panel considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to a mark in which

with Complainant see also Google Inc v James Lucas / FireStudio / Jameschee / FIRESTUDIO / SEONG YONG FA1502001605757 Forum Apr 7 2015 This Panel agrees that Respondent's inclusion of advertisements to likely reap click-through fees is an

� Google LLC v Nanci Nette / Name Management Group Claim Number FA2112001977287 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by Fabricio Vayra of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia USA.� Respondent is Nanci Nette / Name

under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world Complainant

appears to be located Google search results for the CANVA term pertain to the Complainant s offerings It is therefore clear that the simplest of Internet searches would have otherwise revealed to the Respondent the Complainant s established

It does appear that a Google search on Cloud Mojo does not result in a listing for the Complainant at least on the first three pages of results As the Complainant points out however a number of prior decisions have found that such a word

awards It points out that a Google search for the NATIXIS mark gives 3 810 000 results but that its website appears first In these circumstances the Complainant submits that it is very unlikely that the Respondent was unaware of the Complainant s

s activity is found on Google when making a relevant search Such searches on the contrary show the Complainant s websites and business activities The Complainant has not licensed or authorized the Respondent to use its trademarks or to

for the term eqiuifax via Google all results triggered relate to the trade mark EQUIFAX Then there is the addition of the gTLD com As is widely accepted the addition of a gTLD such as com is merely a technical registration requirement and as

15 2021 � On December 16 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the universlnutrition.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent

distinctive noting that a Google search for Mary Washington yields only results for the University of Mary Washington Mary Ball Washington the mother of President George Washington and the person after whom Complainant was named and Complainant

under Policy � 4 b iv See Google Inc v Petrovich FA 1339345 Forum Sept 23 2010 finding that a disputed domain name which resolves to a landing page that distributes malware to Internet users computers demonstrates Respondent's bad faith under

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on November 1 2021 On November 1 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

had carried out even a basic Google search in respect of the wordings INTESA SANPAOLO and INTESA the same would have yielded obvious references to the Complainant The Complainant relies on an extract of a Google search in support of its

LURPAK PROMO lurpak promo www google com 12 K Complainant s Registrar Respondent

de dominio en disputa es Google LLC 3 Iter Procedimental La Demanda se presentó ante el Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI el Centro el 25 de octubre de 2021 El 25 de octubre de 2021 el Centro envió a Google LLC por correo

the first three pages of a Google search on Garrix produce results only for the DJ known as Martin Garrix and not any other people or places known as or by Garrix In these circumstances it appears that Garrix is an invented or coined term and a

including FACEBOOK APPLE GOOGLE PAYPAL TESLA ALIBABA and AMAZON with the addition of terms related to digital currencies such as digital money crypto bank or coin bank The Disputed Domain Names Nos 3 5 6 8 11 12 and 13 redirect to a website in

demonstrates from a Google Images search on the photo of one of these men that it is a stock image found on many other websites Following these profiles were videos such as How to Properly Manage Your Money Like the Rich by an unrelated

which has been blocked by Google Safe Browsing through a warning page The Complainant further asserts that the disputed domain name is not used for any bona fide offerings as the main purpose of the Respondent was to use the above website for

9 2021 � On December 9 2021 Google LLC confirmed by email to the Forum that the statefarmbranch.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world Complainant

� 4 c ii � See for example Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum September 4 2018 concluding that a respondent was not commonly known by a disputed domain name incorporating the GOOGLE mark where the relevant WHOIS

Windows 8 Apple s iOS 7 and Google s Material Design all of which utilize flat design quotation extracted from https //www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/flat-design Therefore the nature of the disputed domain name comprising the

the term metanovartis in the Google search engine the returned results all pointed to the Complainant and its business activities iii considering the fact that the Respondent has also registered other domain names composed by Meta well-known brand

Respondent had carried out a Google search for the name EOLE FINANCE the search results would have yielded immediate and obvious references to the Complainant It is therefore reasonable to infer that the Respondent either knew or should have known

relation to the Complainant A Google search on the expression CREDIT AGRICOLE displays several results all of them being related to the Complainant and its banking activity Thus given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademarks and

15 2021 � On December 15 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the abbviecareer.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

of Policy � 4 a I See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

to more than 26 million Google search results for luma and 160 pending and registered LUMA or LUMA-formative trademarks in the United States alone The owner of one of these trademarks LUMA PICTURES filed and then withdrew a UDRP complaint in

Name is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on October 22 2021 On October 25 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

as Facebook YouTube Instagram Google and Twitter Factual Background The Complainant is a games manufacturer and markets an online game called STAR STABLE ONLINE and is the owner of the trademark and service mark STAR STABLE as described above which

which has been blocked by Google Safe Browsing through a warning page The Respondent s main purpose with the disputed domain name is for phishing financial information in an attempt to defraud the Complainant s customers In the alternative the

ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION � Google LLC v Carolina Rodrigues / Fundacion Comercio Electronico Claim Number FA2112001975458 � PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC Complainant represented by James R Davis II of Perkins Coie LLP District of Columbia

13 2021 � On December 14 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the rockhardtoolz.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name Google LLC has verified that Respondent is

to Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world see also

c ii � See�Google Inc v S S / Google International FA1506001625742 Forum�Aug 4 2015 Respondent did identify itself as �Google International in connection with its registration of the Disputed Domain Name and this is reflected in the WHOIS

and superdrystore.com In Google-page rankings superdry.com is position number one for the search term SUPERDRY The Complainant is the proprietor of a number of registered trademarks for the brand SUPERDRY covering clothing and accessories plus

DO PAINEL ADMINISTRATIVO Google LLC v Ilton Medeiros Da Cruz Caso No DBR2021-0013 1 As Partes A Reclamante é Google LLC Estados Unidos da América representada por Daniel Advogados Brasil A Reclamada é Ilton Medeiros Da Cruz Brasil 2 Os

is registered with Google LLC the Registrar 3 Procedural History The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center the Center on October 22 2021 On October 22 2021 the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a

Employer available on Google Play and Apple App Store which enable users to access the Complainant s services The disputed domain name was registered on September 14 2021 It redirects Internet users to third-party nonsecure websites 5

8 2021 � On December 9 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the margaritavilleparadise.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that

the BEHANCE website see also Google LLC v Vladimir / YouProject FA1905001845222 Forum June 30 2019 Respondent's use of the confusingly similar� youtuby.xyz �domain name to deceive internet users and foster conduct against Complainant's terms of

under Policy � 4 a iii See Google Inc v Domain Admin / Whois Privacy Corp FA1506001622862 Forum Aug 10 2015 finding that the respondent's apparent use of the disputed domain name in furtherance of a �phishing scheme further established its bad

of the case here � A simple Google search using simpleplan immediately returns as a first result consecutive pages the SIMPLE PLAN band See Exhibit K hereto � Respondent states that he did not know about SIMPLE PLAN but now says the phrase is

simply i typing odaseva into Google Translate and selecting the detect language function and then ii checking the Wikipedia entry for Bosnian Australians Nothing in the Response lends additional credibility to the Respondent s proposed use for the

citado nombre de dominio es Google LLC 3 Iter Procedimental La Demanda se presentó ante el Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de la OMPI el Centro el 5 de noviembre de 2021 El mismo día el Centro envió a Google LLC vía correo electrónico una

s customers and that Google promptly stopped the illicit activity carried out by the Respondent No challenge has been made by the Respondent to the Complainant s assertion as it has not filed any administrative compliant response Given the

found at the top of a simple Google Search and despite of it registered as a domain name on November 24 2021 very well after Complainant s trademark rights over NEXGARD on May 29 2013 and 5 the Respondent is not making a bona fide offering of

fault of a bot operated by Google.com.� Respondent further contends that We used to be laeinfo.com and that the website once resolving from that domain name is not currently operating � In fact however the content of that website is accessible

3 2021 � On December 3 2021 Google LLC confirmed by e-mail to the Forum that the suncastcomrnercialsales.com domain name is registered with Google LLC and that Respondent is the current registrant of the name.� Google LLC has verified that

resolving website See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

was created Moreover all the Google results for the term METACAM refers to the Complainant s drug Given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademarks and reputation it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name

the disputed domain name See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 concluding that Respondent was not commonly known by the disputed domain name where the WHOIS of record identifies the Respondent as Bhawana

la OMPI DECISI� N DEL EXPERTO Google LLC c Javier Cruz Fernandez Caso no DES2021-0042 1 Las Partes La Demandante es Google LLC Estados Unidos de América Estados Unidos representada por Carlos Polo y Asociados España El Demandado es Javier Cruz

as follows � Complainant Google LLC operates one of the most highly recognized search engine services � Complainant has rights in the GOOGLE mark based on registration of the mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO �

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world �

under Policy � 4 a iii � See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world �

for the term immo-afer via Google top results triggered relate to the trade mark AFER IMMO and the Complainant Then there is the addition of the generic Top-Level-Domain gTLD com As is generally accepted the addition of a gTLD such as com is

simple online search e.g via Google or Baidu for the term arkea would have revealed that it is a brand enjoying a definite degree of fame worldwide The Respondent has provided no explanation or evidence to justify its registration of the disputed

ni aparecen en el buscador de Google con la marca FOTOMATON BARCELONA luego no pueden hacer la competencia ni aprovecharse de la reputación de la Demandante o ser utilizados de mala fe y además fueron adquiridos en 2017 sin que hasta ahora haya

l aide du moteur de recherche Google configuré de telle manière que la requête soit localisée en France pays dans lequel le Défendeur a indiqué son domicile La quasi-totalité des résultats se rapporte au Requérant tandis qu aucun ne

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world Complainant

under Policy � 4 a iii � See Google Inc v Ahmed Humood FA1411001591796 Forum Jan 7 2015 This Panel makes that inference Respondent has actual knowledge of Complainant's mark at the time of domain name registration based on the fame of

for Novartispharmacie in the Google search engine the returned results pointed to the Complainant and its business activities The Respondent could have easily performed a similar search before registering the Disputed Domain Name and would have

On the contrary a Google search of travismathew reveals that the results of such search are referred to the Complainant There is no evidence that the Respondent has been making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Domain Name

provided evidence that the Google search of the terms verisure or verisuresmartalarms leads to the Complainant and its business Additionally the Complainant provided evidence that the Respondent does not have any trademarks corresponding to the

top level AA 1 at issue google status.com aftershokzus com praftershokzus ALIBABA COM names � postmaster@aftershokzus postmaster@praftershokzus 1 ��� 2 4 Respondent 3 0 google-status name L C calcuttawebdevelopers Page Click ICANN s

mark under Policy � 4 a i See Google LLC v Bhawana Chandel / Admission Virus FA 1799694 Forum Sept 4 2018 Complainant has rights in the GMAIL mark based upon its registration of the mark with numerous trademark agencies around the world Complainant

account tiktoksaudia and a Google Play Store apps TikTok Store which incorporate Complainant's TIK TOK trademark Complainant contends that these incidents indicate Respondent's general intent to profit from the reputation and goodwill of